Trespass Orders Shouldn’t Stand
“The petty and vindictive trespass orders issued to people who simply visited the Parliament protest shouldn’t stand”, says ACT Leader David Seymour.
“The orders will only result in lengthy and costly legal battles and taxpayers will lose.
“Similar cases have been through the courts and the Speaker lost.
“A 1997 protest led to ten years of legal action from 1999 until it was resolved in 2009. The Speaker and Police lost in each case because trespassing protesters was an unjustified restriction on their rights.
“The courts are likely to throw out a trespass order issued to someone who simply visited the Parliament protest and walked around because it would be an unjustified restriction on their freedom of expression.
“Do we really want to be tied up in court for another ten years with the taxpayer paying the legal bills? ACT says no.
“The focus should be on those who were violent or there is reason to believe will cause trouble in the future.
“Sleeping dogs should have been left to lie instead of inflaming a situation that has already cost taxpayers millions.
“New Zealanders are suffering through a cost of living crisis. Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to pay to fight futile legal battles.
“Trevor Mallard should take some responsibility and rescind the trespass orders.”
Gordon Campbell: On How US Courts Are Helping Donald Trump Steal The Mid-Terms
Office of the Ombudsman: Ombudsman Publishes Findings On Ministry Of Education Sensitive Claims Scheme
Nelson City Council: Mayor Welcomes Auditor-General Decision Not To Prosecute Councillor
Johnnie Freeland: Ko Tātou Tātou - Climate Action In Aotearoa Begins With Relationship
Zero Waste Network Aotearoa: Container Return Scheme Bill Would Double Recycling Rates And Put Money Back In Households
Wellington City Council: Statement From The Wellington Mayoral Forum On Options For Regional Governance Reform
MUNZ: TAIC Report On Kaitaki Incident Gives Shocking Picture Of Decline Of NZ Maritime Infrastructure

