Government Brings Certainty To Climate Change Tort Law
Hon Paul
Goldsmith
Minister of Justice
The Government is clarifying climate change laws to provide businesses with certainty around their obligations, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says.
“Ongoing litigation in the High Court, where an applicant has brought civil claims against six major businesses for their greenhouse gas emissions, is creating uncertainty in business confidence and investment that the Government must address.
“The Government is acting now to provide legal clarity and certainty, and to remove the possible development of a new regime that contradicts the framework Parliament has already enacted to respond to climate change.
“Our government is committed to fixing the basics, and certainty of law is essential for businesses to operate, attracting overseas investment, and stimulating economic growth.
“Therefore, the Government will amend the Climate Change Response Act 2002 to prevent findings of liability for tort for climate change damage or harm caused by greenhouse gas emissions in both current and future proceedings before the courts.
“Our response to climate change is best managed by the Government at a national level and not through piece-meal litigation in the courts. New Zealand already has a legal framework to manage greenhouse gas emissions set through Parliament through the Climate Change Response Act 2002 and the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
“It is essential to maintain the coherence of the regulatory system and to deliver consistent obligations for greenhouse gas emitters.
“The courts are not the right place to resolve claims of harm from climate change, and tort law is not well-suited to respond to a problem like climate change which involves a range of complex environmental, economic and social factors.
“This law change will not alter the Government’s responsibilities under the Climate Change Response Act and businesses that have obligations under the ETS will still be required to meet them.”
Notes:
- In a case before the High Court (Smith v Fonterra and others) the applicant has brought tort claims including in public nuisance and a novel tort claim for damage to the climate system against six emitters.
- The case was initially struck out by the Court of Appeal in October 2021 but reinstated by the Supreme Court in February 2024 and sent back to the High Court for trial, which is due to begin in April 2027.
- A tort is a civil claim brought in private law in situations where the conduct of one person causes harm or invades the interests of another. It is primarily developed through common law (i.e., court-made law).
- The Government’s proposed law change will prevent findings of liability in tort for climate change damage or harm caused by greenhouse gas emissions. The law change would apply to the existing High Court case.
Gordon Campbell: On How US Courts Are Helping Donald Trump Steal The Mid-Terms
Forest And Bird: Government Biodiversity Credit Scheme Welcomed As Opportunity For Restoration
Office of the Ombudsman: Ombudsman Publishes Findings On Ministry Of Education Sensitive Claims Scheme
Nelson City Council: Mayor Welcomes Auditor-General Decision Not To Prosecute Councillor
Johnnie Freeland: Ko Tātou Tātou - Climate Action In Aotearoa Begins With Relationship
Zero Waste Network Aotearoa: Container Return Scheme Bill Would Double Recycling Rates And Put Money Back In Households
Wellington City Council: Statement From The Wellington Mayoral Forum On Options For Regional Governance Reform

