Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Governor-General and the Australian Constitution

The Governor-General and the Australian Constitution

Recent events surrounding the accusations levelled against the Governor-General of Australia, although disquieting, have proven that Australia's system of constitutional monarchy has, as always, worked and worked well.

Amidst the controversy, the machinery of government proceeded smoothly and without interruption despite the standing aside and now the resignation of the Governor-General, Dr Peter Hollingworth.

It was the Labour Prime Minister James Scullin who, quite rightly, insisted in 1930 that the decision of the Australian Cabinet on the nomination of the Governor-General was paramount. However, it later became convention that responsibility for later nominations fell into the sole prerogative of the Prime Minister.

The reasoning of those Australian Labour Party leaders, in particular, who are now asserting that the process is flawed and that the flaw is somehow related to the constitutional monarchy is not only totally unsound but fails to take into account that there have been five Labour Prime Ministers since Scullin, all of whom jealously guarded their prerogative rather than opening the nomination process to wide consultation.

There is no constitutional impediment to prohibit any Prime Minister from consulting with his or her Cabinet or with the Leader of the Opposition prior to submitting a nomination to the Queen. This consultation did occur. It is unfortunate that the possibility of later accusations arising against Dr Hollingworth was not disclosed then, but there is no reason to suppose that involving the public, Parliament, or anyone else, would have done so either.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Those who argue for involving Parliament or the electorate are guilty of attempting to mislead the public. They are motivated by a desire for a republic, but are not honest enough to say so - nor are they able to admit that this whole unfortunate situation has little if anything to do with the monarchy-republic debate in Australia - except that the republicans saw an easy target and subjected the Governor-General to merciless attacks until he resigned. The President of the Australian Council of Civil Liberties has described this as a witch-hunt.

Dr Hollingworth's appointment was widely welcomed at the time. It is only with hindsight that it may have been unwise. In any event republics do not necessarily handle similar events with anything like the flexibility of the Australian (or indeed New Zealand) Constitution. We might recall the serious allegations made against Dr Kurt Waldheim and President Nixon. As a result of the former, the President of Austria was ostracized at home and abroad for most of his term, and the latter, the government of the USA was destabilized for a long period. To suggets that electing the Governor-General would have prevented the Hollingworth episode is simply incorrect. The beauty of the system is that good candidates are appointed without having to secure political support - as would be required for any elected system. The great majority of people thought that Dr Hollingworth was a good candidate

Dr Noel Cox Chairman Monarchist League of New Zealand Inc.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The US Opposition To Mortgage Interest Deductibility For Landlords


Should landlords be able to deduct the interest on the loans they take out to bankroll their property speculation? The US Senate Budget Committee and Bloomberg News don't think this is a good idea, for reasons set out below. Regardless, our coalition government has been burning through a ton of political capital by giving landlords a huge $2.9 billion tax break via interest deductibility, while still preaching the need for austerity to the disabled, and to everyone else...
More


 
 

Government: Concerns Conveyed To China Over Cyber Activity
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government. “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity... More

ALSO:


Government: GDP Decline Reinforces Government’s Fiscal Plan

Declining GDP for the December quarter reinforces the importance of restoring fiscal discipline to public spending and driving more economic growth, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says... More

ALSO:


Government: Humanitarian Support For Gaza & West Bank

Winston Peters has announced NZ is providing a further $5M to respond to the extreme humanitarian need in Gaza and the West Bank. “The impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict on civilians is absolutely appalling," he said... More


Government: New High Court Judge Appointed

Judith Collins has announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister Jason Scott McHerron as a High Court Judge. Justice McHerron graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in English Literature in 1994 and an LLB in 1996... More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.