Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Open letter to Nick Smith - Climate Conversation

Open letter to Nick Smith from Climate Conversation Group

Dear Minister,

Yesterday you told Parliament that our citizens must “contribute” a “significant” amount towards the government’s climate change targets.

You think they should give about $30 per week per family. We agree that is “significant”. Barry Brill, former National Energy Minister, who prompted Rodney Hide’s question to you, asserted it will be more like $112 per week.

Now that’s more like political suicide. Incredible! Incredible, because you haven’t refuted it, you’ve only disagreed with it, but, more importantly, you haven’t told us what we get for it. Hope you check the price, too.

“We’ll charge you this amount, unless we charge four times more. Sign here, OK?”

We’re horrified at this public expression of disdain from our bright new National government towards the people of New Zealand, who haven’t been consulted over this life-threatening new tax. Yes, life-threatening; that’s a huge amount to take out of household budgets, even if the economy wasn’t already struggling.

Seen the jobless figures lately? The unemployment rate is 6.0% and there are 138,000 people unemployed, the highest since 2000.

The other thing about our citizens: a huge majority scorn the carbon reduction targets. In the Herald’s recent online poll (admittedly, not a scientific instrument) 89% voted that the targets were unachievable. Only 11% disagreed.

Our question for you, minister, (prompted by Prof. Bob Carter) is: “How much global warming, in degrees C, will be averted by NZ families sacrificing $30 per week, perhaps more, for the next several decades?”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

This question is direct and reasonable and should have been already answered by the government. It should have been broadcast loudly. We should all know it off by heart. It is the sort of question asked by every organisation to justify not just some, but every large expenditure: “What do we get for our money?” Everybody asks this, but not these Nats, it seems.

So what do we get, Dr Smith? What do we get for something that will cost our families from $30 to $112 each and every week from now until the utmost limits of our parliamentary majority? What do we get?

It had better be something pretty wonderful.

We will ask the question until it’s answered, Dr Smith.

Yours faithfully,
Richard Treadgold
Convenor
Climate Conversation Group


ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.