Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

The Destructive Religion of Julie-Anne Genter

The Green MP’s call for ACC to divest of its $1Bl investment in fossil fuels overlooks a few basic truths clearly understood by New Conservative and the average New Zealander.

No 1 is that 80% of the world’s energy comes from fossil fuels. It is an economically sound investment, and seeing as ACC is charged with investing our money wisely, it is a logical choice. (Incidentally a further 10% comes from biofuels which are blamed for massive deforestation across the globe, and 5% from Nuclear. How palatable is that?)

No 2 is that every tourist that comes to New Zealand does so burning fossil fuels, so banning investment in them, while being reliant on them, is an ideological stance rather than a logical or wise one.

“If Ms Genter wants to take that religious stance with her own money and personal finances fine, but as a Minister of the crown she is charged with looking after New Zealand’s interests, and we are dependent on fossil fuels and will be for a long time yet,” says Leighton Baker, New Conservative Leader

China is looking at building two large coal fired power plants a month for the next 12 years according to Greenpeace. (https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2019/03/28/china-new-coal-plants-2030-climate/) Ms Genter is naïve if she believes that New Zealand’s stand on Carbon will make one scrap of difference to the world’s ecology.

For New Zealand to have any noticeable effect on the environment we should be investing in pollution solutions, not jeopardising industry and investments through carbon virtue signally. Utilising New Zealand’s creativity and problem solving capabilities means that we would be able to export solutions to the world’s pollution woes, rather than aimlessly spending billions of dollars on a substance we produce little of, without being able to quantify any benefit from the billions spent.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“We call on this government to concentrate on its mandate to look after New Zealand’s interests and not throw us under the carbon bus,” concludes Baker. The Green MP’s call for ACC to divest of its $1Bl investment in fossil fuels overlooks a few basic truths clearly understood by New Conservative and the average New Zealander.

No 1 is that 80% of the world’s energy comes from fossil fuels. It is an economically sound investment, and seeing as ACC is charged with investing our money wisely, it is a logical choice. (Incidentally a further 10% comes from biofuels which are blamed for massive deforestation across the globe, and 5% from Nuclear. How palatable is that?)

No 2 is that every tourist that comes to New Zealand does so burning fossil fuels, so banning investment in them, while being reliant on them, is an ideological stance rather than a logical or wise one.

“If Ms Genter wants to take that religious stance with her own money and personal finances fine, but as a Minister of the crown she is charged with looking after New Zealand’s interests, and we are dependent on fossil fuels and will be for a long time yet,” says Leighton Baker, New Conservative Leader

China is looking at building two large coal fired power plants a month for the next 12 years according to Greenpeace. (https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2019/03/28/china-new-coal-plants-2030-climate/) Ms Genter is naïve if she believes that New Zealand’s stand on Carbon will make one scrap of difference to the world’s ecology.

For New Zealand to have any noticeable effect on the environment we should be investing in pollution solutions, not jeopardising industry and investments through carbon virtue signally. Utilising New Zealand’s creativity and problem solving capabilities means that we would be able to export solutions to the world’s pollution woes, rather than aimlessly spending billions of dollars on a substance we produce little of, without being able to quantify any benefit from the billions spent.

“We call on this government to concentrate on its mandate to look after New Zealand’s interests and not throw us under the carbon bus,” concludes Baker.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.