Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
License needed for work use Register



Cablegate: Ambassador Discusses Northern Pipelines With

This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.





E.O. 12958: N/A

1. (U) Sensitive but unclassified. Not for distribution
outside USG channels.

2. (SBU) Summary: The Ambassador paid a courtesy call
December 14 on Minister of Natural Resources John Efford,
reviewing a range of topics relating to plans for natural
gas pipelines from Alaska's North Slope and Canada's
Mackenzie Valley. Regarding the Alaska pipeline, Minister
Efford said that any move to issue construction permits for
the Canadian portion of the line that did not recognize
TransCanada PipeLine Ltd.'s exclusive construction
"certificates" would raise a host of legal, regulatory and
financial issues. As for the Mackenzie Valley project,
Efford said that the issue of compensation for the Deh Cho
aboriginal band is currently before the courts, and he
expressed hope that the judicial process would move
quickly. Minister Efford also touched on the prospects for
liquid natural gas (LNG) facilities in Canada, and trilateral
energy initiatives with Mexico under the North American
Energy Working Group (NAEWG). He expressed hope that the
Energy Secretary-designate would be able to visit Canada
soon. End summary.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Alaska Gas Pipeline

3. (SBU) Meeting with the Ambassador and ESTOFF in a
conference room in Ottawa's Parliament Building, Minister
Efford underlined that TransCanada believes very strongly
that it has, through its Foothills Pipe Lines subsidiary,
exclusive "certificates of convenience and public
necessity," issued in the 1970s, to construct the Canadian
portion of the Alaska natural gas pipeline. The authority
for the certificates is derived through the Northern
Pipeline Act (NPA) of 1977, currently the only Canadian law
specifically addressing the Alaska gas pipeline. Through
another wholly owned subsidiary, TransCanada also holds
certificates for the Alaska portion of the line under the
1976 Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Act. The U.S.
portion of the line may also be built under the separate
authority of the Natural Gas Act, in which case
TransCanada's certificates would have no standing.

4. (SBU) Referring to a recent round of lobbying in Canada
against the exclusivity of TransCanada's certificates by
North Slope gas producers BP and Conoco-Phillips, Efford
said that the producers yet to come up with a realistic
alternative pipeline proposal (the third producer,
ExxonMobil, has told us that they believe it is premature
to address the certificates issue until the producers
establish financial terms for the pipeline). Efford said
that while the producers have voiced a general complaint
that they do not want to be locked into doing business only
with TransCanada, he believes that there is ample room for
negotiation among all the stakeholders regarding who will
build the pipeline.

5. (SBU) Efford opined that any challenge to TransCanada's
NPA certificates would "absolutely" provoke an immediate
court challenge, as the company believes it has maintained
the validity of its certificates for nearly thirty years.
Efford also voiced concern that any move by Canada to
revise its legislation and issue certificates to another
company could force a renegotiation of the 1977 U.S.-Canada
Transit Pipeline Treaty. He further noted that the
environmental permitting process, always difficult in
Canada, would become even more complicated if a route other
than TransCanada's were to be proposed. As an aside,
Efford told us that he has argued within the GOC for
instituting timetables for Environmental Impact
Assessments, but that writing a timetable into legislation
is "almost impossible."

6. (SBU) Efford noted that the U.S. Congress inserted a
"Sense of Congress" resolution in the 2004 Alaska Natural
Gas Pipeline Act that the steel for the Alaska pipeline be
made in North America, but that the 52-inch pipeline
favored by BP and Conoco-Phillips could only be
manufactured in Asia. Efford acknowledged that the
pipeline requirements have changed since 1977, when
certificates were issued for a 48-inch pipeline, but said
the technology for pipeline construction and operation has
advanced greatly in the past 25 years. He stated that a
48-inch pipeline, manufactured in North America using
modern methods, should be adequate for the pipeline's
current requirements.

Mackenzie Valley and the Deh Cho Process

7. (SBU) Efford told us that the Deh Cho band is using the
Mackenzie Valley gas pipeline project to gain leverage for
tribal land claims. About 40 percent of the proposed
pipeline's route would pass through Deh Cho lands, and the
band is suing the Government of Canada to gain more
representation on the pipeline review panel. Efford
expressed hope that the judicial process will move quickly
to resolve the Deh Cho's claim, and noted that the issue of
the Deh Cho's participation has not yet led to delays in
the project.

Other Energy Matters

8. (SBU) Regarding the construction of LNG projects in
Canada, Efford said that the Irving Oil Company is already
performing preliminary work on a new terminal in Saint
John, New Brunswick. He also stated that that there is
unlikely to be serious opposition to other proposed LNG
terminals in Atlantic Canada. Efford said that he
understood U.S. initiatives to make Mexico a full partner
in North American energy issues, and that Canada supported
the effort. At the conclusion of the meeting, Efford told
us that he hoped the new U.S. Energy Secretary-designate
would be able to visit Canada as soon as possible. The
Ambassador responded that a visit might usefully include a
tour of the Alberta oil sands or the James Bay
hydroelectric projects in Quebec.

Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
World Headlines

UN News: Aid Access Is Key Priority

Among the key issues facing diplomats is securing the release of a reported 199 Israeli hostages, seized during the Hamas raid. “History is watching,” says Emergency Relief Coordinator Martin Griffiths. “This war was started by taking those hostages. Of course, there's a history between Palestinian people and the Israeli people, and I'm not denying any of that. But that act alone lit a fire, which can only be put out with the release of those hostages.” More

Save The Children: Four Earthquakes In a Week Leave Thousands Homeless

Families in western Afghanistan are reeling after a fourth earthquake hit Herat Province, crumbling buildings and forcing people to flee once again, with thousands now living in tents exposed to fierce winds and dust storms. The latest 6.3 magnitude earthquake hit 30 km outside of Herat on Sunday, shattering communities still reeling from strong and shallow aftershocks. More

UN News: Nowhere To Go In Gaza

UN Spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said some 1.1M people would be expected to leave northern Gaza and that such a movement would be “impossible” without devastating humanitarian consequences and appeals for the order to be rescinded. The WHO joined the call for Israel to rescind the relocation order, which amounted to a “death sentence” for many. More

Access Now: Telecom Blackout In Gaza An Attack On Human Rights

By October 10, reports indicated that fixed-line internet, mobile data, SMS, telephone, and TV networks are all seriously compromised. With significant and increasing damage to the electrical grid, orders by the Israeli Ministry of Energy to stop supplying electricity and the last remaining power station now out of fuel, many are no longer able to charge devices that are essential to communicate and access information. More


Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.