Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


The Mapp Report: Cartoons and freedom of speech

The Mapp Report

The cartoons and freedom of speech

Were the newspapers and television stations right to publish the cartoons? Do they have responsibility to consider any other factors except the right to publish?

Freedom of speech is more than a theoretical concept. People must feel free to actually exercise it. But as with all freedoms there is a responsibility that requires us to think about the consequence before we exercise it.

Of course the media had the right to publish the cartoons. That is what free speech means.

The idea of free speech ran hard up against the Censors Office decision to ban videos on the gay lifestyle from being distributed by the Human Rights Action Group. The Group was absolutely right to challenge the decision of the Censor because it wasn’t just a suggestion of whether it was in good taste to distribute the videos, but the Censors decision to prohibit their distribution. The Human Rights Action Group would have been banned from exercising their freedom of speech.

The argument of whether or not to publish the cartoons of Mohammad is not whether there is freedom of speech to do so; clearly there is. Rather, the issue is whether it was wise to do so.

We know from experience that there are particular sensitivities around religion. The decision in 1998 by Te Papa to display the Virgin in a Condom was particularly controversial. I received a large amount of correspondence on this issue, mostly from people offended by the display. I wrote to Te Papa expressing my concern that the exhibition was offensive to many Christians. I did not consider that Te Papa, our national museum, should deliberately set out to offend Christians or any other religious group.

Clearly, Muslims are very sensitive about these issues – judging by the protests they are clearly more so than other religions. Many of the protests are extreme, and play into the hands of those who talk and write of the clash of civilisations. It is obviously stupid for radical Muslims to say, “If you publish the cartoons, I will kill you.” Governments that encourage such protests should be subject to international condemnation.

However, this whole issue further illustrates how tensions are already running high between the Muslim world and the West. There is little to be gained by inflaming the situation further or by provoking reaction even if we know the reactions are going to be excessive.

The media can say they were exercising private rights and do not have any public responsibilities. However decisions of mainstream media do have public impact. The way in which religions are satired or commented on does matter. No Christians have said they are immune to criticism, but the Virgin in a Condom was seen deliberately to offend. Similarly showing Mohammad with a bomb on his head has the same effect – it should be obvious that would be deeply offensive to most Muslims.

The editors of the Dominion Post and the Christchurch Press have now apologised. I presume they did so because they saw that at least some of the cartoons went beyond reasonable comment and into the area of gratuitous insult.

Freedom of speech does have responsibilities. How many think it is reasonable for us to gratuitously insult other people, even though we have the right to do so?

Dr Wayne Mapp

Visit my website for more information at: www.waynemapp.co.nz

13 February 2006

SuperBlues Monday Morning Tea Group
with speaker
Dr Jackie Blue

24 February 2006
Business luncheon at Takapuna Boating Club with guest speaker
Hon Bill English

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>


Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>


Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>


General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>


Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop



Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news