Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
License needed for work use Register

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Govt Building (Sand)Castles In The Air

4 October 2004

Govt Building (Sand)Castles In The Air

Sandcastles will be walking the streets of Wellington today on the last day of the Select Committee hearings on the Foreshore and Seabed Bill.

"The government is building (sand)castles in the air if they imagine this confiscation legislation is going to be any kind of solution on the foreshore and seabed. If the Bill is passed, it will cause conflict for years to come", said Takutai Poneke spokesperson Kiri Allan.

The Fisheries and Other Sea Related Select Committee have been hearing submissions since August but have invited oral submissions from less that 10% of all submissions received.

"The entire process to date has been a total sham."

"From the 'consultation' hui last year where the government's proposals were overwhelmingly rejected, the foreshore and seabed hikoi in May, to the Select Committee process where only one or two submitters out of more than 3, 900 have been fully in support of the legislation, it is obvious that there is significant opposition to the Bill. So why is the government going full steam ahead with it?" asked Ms Allan.

"The fact that the Bill allows the government to sell the foreshore and seabed by a simple Act of Parliament suggests that privatisation and profit is the motive", she stated.

"The Bill is fundamentally flawed and breaches the Treaty of Waitangi, the Bill of Rights Act and the Human Rights Act as the Human Rights Commission and other submissions on the Bill have made clear. The proposed legislation also violates international human rights conventions - the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination has already asked for an explanation of the Bill from the government", said Ms Allan.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

"Iwi and hapu have put forward a variety of alternative ways to achieve the government's stated objectives without breaching anyone's human rights, but the government has ignored those alternatives. Existing situations where there is Maori ownership of popular beaches and no problem at all with public access, such as Okahu Bay in Auckland, show there clearly are alternatives to this Bill.

"The level of opposition to the Bill, the likelihood of international condemnation, and the fact that real alternatives have been put forward and ignored by the government shows that they have a hidden agenda", Ms Allan concluded.

The sandcastles in Wellington today will be distributing information about the Foreshore and Seabed Bill and the second foreshore and seabed hikoi which will take place in Auckland on 16 October 2004.


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Government's Assault On Maori

This isn’t news, but the National-led coalition is mounting a sustained assault on Treaty rights and obligations. Audrey Young in the NZ Herald has compiled a useful list of the many ways Christopher Luxon plans to roll back the progress made in race relations over the past forty years. He has described yesterday’s nationwide protests by Maori as “pretty unfair.” Poor thing. More


ACT: Renews Call To Abolish Human Rights Commission

“The Human Rights Commission’s appointment of a second Chief Executive is just the latest example of a taxpayer-funded bureaucracy serving itself at the expense of delivery for New Zealanders,” says ACT MP Todd Stephenson... More

Public Housing Futures: Christmas Comes Early For Landlords

New CTU analysis of the National & ACT coalition agreement has shown the cost of returning interest deductibility to landlords is an extra $900M on top of National’s original proposal. This is because it is going to be implemented earlier and faster, including retrospective rebates from April 2023. More

PSA: MFAT Must Reverse Decision To Remove Te Reo

MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru. More




InfoPages News Channels


Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.