Q+A: Shane Taurima Interviews Steven Joyce
Q+A: Shane Taurima Interviews Steven
Joyce
Steven Joyce on the new Super
Ministry he’s head of which starts on July 1: “It’s
only a restructuring of a ministry. It’s not the answer to
the world’s problems, but it is
important.”
Joyce says it’s designed to cut
through interagency discussions, which there are too many of
currently in government.
Joyce says he feels for
Reserve Bank Governor Alan Bollard: “One day he’s out
there, he’s sandwiched in between the period leading up to
the Greek elections and then the GDP figures come out the
following week”.
Joyce confident the Government
won’t back down over asset sales.
The
Government’s promise to get back into surplus by 2014/15
remains a “key promise”.
Wouldn’t directly
rule in or out a pay rise for the police, but says: “The
reality is you need to grow the economy to actually create
more income to pay for the public services. And in the
meantime, things are going to be tight because, actually,
we’re spending more than we’re
earning.”
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on TV ONE.
Repeats of Q&A will screen on TVNZ7 at 9pm Sundays and 9am
and 1pm on Mondays.
Thanks to the support from
NZ ON Air.
Q+A is on Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/NZQandA#!/NZQandA
and on Twitter, http://twitter.com/#!/NZQandA
Q
+ A
SHANE TAURIMA INTERVIEWS STEVEN
JOYCE
GREG
Next week, on the 1st of July, a new super-ministry
starts work, called the Ministry of Business, Innovation and
Employment, merger of the existing Economic Development and
Science and Innovation Ministries with the Department of
Labour and Department of Building and Housing. It will
lead the Government’s growth agenda. That’s coming
under some pressure, with Reserve Bank Governor Dr Alan
Bollard the latest to cast gloom over National’s plans.
So is it time for a rethink? Shane Taurima is with the new
Minister of Business, Steven
Joyce.
SHANE
Good morning, Minister. Thank you for joining
us. Lucy Lawless is clearly not happy with the
Government. She says you’re missing opportunities. Is
she right?
STEVEN JOYCE – Economic
Development Minister
No,
I don’t think so, and with the greatest respect to Lucy, I
think she’s got one view. I think the rest of the world
has other views. And in relation to economic growth and
exploring all our country’s opportunities in the world, I
think we’re focused on a whole range of fronts, and that
includes areas like clean tech. It includes a range of
industries, and, frankly, we have to take advantage of all
our opportunities if we’re to get New Zealand growing
faster.
SHANE
Amy Adams, the minister, of course, has been in
Rio, stressing just how vital a green economy is to New
Zealand. Back home, though, you’ve been rubbishing a
green growth report which is backed by, you know, fairly
senior business leaders like Sir Stephen Tindall and Rob
Fyfe. Are we practising what we
preach?
STEVEN Well,
no, I’m not rubbishing it, and, you know, you should be
careful that you don’t just adopt the Labour Party spin.
What I’ve been
saying—
SHANE
But you criticised it, though, didn’t
you?
STEVEN Yes,
there’s elements of it that I will
criticise.
SHANE Is that not
rubbishing?
STEVEN No,
it isn’t, because I didn’t rubbish the whole report.
There’s some good things in the report which you certainly
want to take the opportunity to encourage, including their
approach, which is say to encourage businesses to explore
opportunities to get ahead through green growth. But what
I am not so fussed with is the idea that somehow there are
still dirty industries in the world and then there’s some
clean industries. And then they say that the dirty
industries, which just happen to be about 80% of our
exports, by the way, are the ones that we shouldn’t be
encouraging. And I think you’ve got to be a little bit
more nuanced than that, and, frankly, I think the debate’s
moved on and it’s actually about greening growth, ie,
improving our environmental outputs across a range of
industries. It’s not about just saying, ‘Oh, well,
these ones are hopeless. Let’s drop
those.’
SHANE
But you’ve just said we’ve had to prioritise
everything, not just green growth.
STEVEN
I think we have to— Yeah, we have to
be across a range of things. If you look at that,
there’s fantastic opportunities for New Zealand over the
next 30 years. And the neatest one is the fact that Asia
is growing; it’s right on our doorstep; it’s much closer
than the old Europe economy. There’s going to be
hundreds and hundreds of millions of middle-class Asians who
are going to want our products, are going to want our
services, who are going to want our food, frankly, over the
next 30 years. We actually have massive potential. I’d
be very disappointed if we tried to ankle-tap ourselves too
much on the way through by saying that we can’t do this
and we can’t do
that.
SHANE
Let’s talk about your new super-ministry because
people at home – they want to know what difference
it’s going to make in their lives. The New Zealand
Manufacturers and Exporters Association boss, as an example,
says it’s a great idea, but he says you can talk about
growth, but that’s not enough. He wants to know how
you’re going to deliver it.
STEVEN
Well, I can agree exactly in that
respect. I don’t always agree with John Walley, so there
you go. That’s a plus. But the reality is it’s all
about momentum, and, frankly, we’re working on a range of
fronts. There’s about six key inputs into business which
are crucial for businesses to be successful, grow and be
competitive. So that’s your innovation, your skills,
your access to markets, your access to capital, your access
to natural resources and your access to supporting
infrastructure. Now, the Government has a programme across
all those six. It’s working very hard to develop that
programme. The advantage of MBIE – look, it’s only a
restructuring of a ministry. It’s not the answer to the
world’s problems, but it is
important—
SHANE
So how is—?
STEVEN
No, let me just take you through it It is
important because it’s all about simplifying the
government processes so we can create more momentum. We
have less interagency discussions, and, believe me, we have
way too many of those in government. Less interagency
discussions, more opportunity to drive the agenda forward
and tick off the things that will help our businesses become
more competitive on the world stage, because that’s
fundamentally what it’s about. If you want jobs in New
Zealand, and I think we can all sign up for that, then that
means you must give our businesses the opportunity to be
more competitive from here relative to other countries in
the world. It’s as simple as that, and it’s as
challenging as that.
SHANE You say it’s
as simple as that, but let’s go back to my initial— my
initial question. People at home – they want to know how
it’s going to make a difference in their lives. I dare
say they’ve just listened to what you’ve said and
they’re still wondering actually how is it going to make a
difference.
STEVEN
Well, at the end of the day, no public-sector
agency is going to wave its magic wand and make a difference
to their lives, but I’ll tell you what it’s going to
do. It’s going to create momentum on that agenda, which
will allow us to grow jobs faster and higher-paying jobs,
and that’s fundamentally what it’s all about. Now,
that’s all done by businesses, but the government’s role
in that is actually making it easier for businesses to be
more competitive, so the outcome is more jobs, stronger
growth.
SHANE
But business doesn’t seem to be responding,
though, does it?
STEVEN
No, I disagree entirely. You didn’t see the GDP
results from last week. It’s only one quarter, but,
again, New Zealand in that
quarter—
SHANE
Yeah, so we had a good start to the year, but
we’re back on the decline now, aren’t we?
STEVEN Well, it
depends on who you listen to, and I feel for Alan Bollard,
for example, because one day he’s out there, he’s
sandwiched in between the period leading up to the Greek
elections and then the GDP figures coming out the following
week. And the reality is for all forecasters at this point
in time, it’s actually very difficult to see where the
world economy is going because of what’s happening around
the world, particularly in Europe. But just look at that
one quarter for argument’s sake. In Australia, New
Zealand and Japan, we’re, I think, the only OECD countries
above the one mark. Certainly, if you look at Europe, it
was growth of nil; the UK – -0.5; the US and Canada –
0.5; we were at 1.1. It’s not the whole story, because
it’s only one quarter, but I’ll take it,
frankly.
SHANE
It’s not the whole story, because I’d like to
put some other figures to you.
STEVEN
Sure.
SHANE Australia’s
outgrown us by five to one. The US and Canada have
outperformed two and a half to one.
STEVEN
No, no, no. That’s not correct.
Just go back—
SHANE
They’re not good figures, though, are they,
Minister?
STEVEN No,
come back to Australia. I think it’s very interesting.
Where do you think the growth is in Australia right now?
Because we’re growing faster than a number of Australian
states, so where do you think the growth
is?
SHANE But
not Australia as a whole.
STEVEN
No, you know why? It’s called
Western Australia. Do you know what’s happening in
Western Australia, Shane? It’s called oil and resources
and liquefied natural gas. That’s what’s happening in
Western Australia, so you can’t say to, you know— it is
actually intellectually dishonest, if I may say, to say on
the one hand we want jobs and growth and faster growth, but
on the other hand, ‘Oh, we don’t want that. We don’t
want that. We don’t want oil and gas. We don’t want
foreign investment. We don’t want increasing strength of
our capital markets.’ There’s a whole range of things
we don’t want. We actually have to call that sort of
criticism in New Zealand because we do need the faster
growth, and the only way you can get faster growth is if you
increase the opportunities for New Zealand businesses to
create jobs in this country and not in Western
Australia.
SHANE
We need to move on because another big part of your
economic plan is state asset sales, which is due to pass its
final hurdle in Parliament in a few days. But, of course,
there’s another hurdle – public opposition. Is there a
point where you listen or when you listen to public feedback
and back down on state asset sales like you did on class
sizes? Or is that simply out of the
question?
STEVEN No,
look, the Government—
SHANE Will you back
down on it?
STEVEN
Shane, do you want to
listen?
SHANE
Well, I do, but—
STEVEN
Just listen. Let me take you through
it.
SHANE
Let’s be specific, though. Will you back
down?
STEVEN No, I
don’t believe the Government’s going to back down on
that at all, and the reason for it is this— well, firstly,
there’s a couple of things. Firstly, we did take it to
the country, and I think what the country said at the last
election was some aspects of, say, for example, mixed
ownership was of concern to them, but they understood the
role of the government in actually bringing the books back
into surplus and creating opportunities for New Zealand
going forward And you can’t buy a quarter of the
package, which was my point in relation to economic
growth. You can’t say, ‘I want the jobs, but I don’t
want this, this and this,’ because, actually, you do have
to provide those opportunities. Now, if you go to the
mixed-ownership model, one of the most important things
about it, which I believe so far, you know, hasn’t been
talked about enough is the strengthening of the capital
markets by getting those shareholdings listed on the capital
markets in New Zealand. Now, the New Zealand capital
markets actually historically, certainly over the last 10
years, have performed very poorly relative to the rest of
the world, and that’s because there’s been some breaches
of faith historically. Go back to 1987 – that’s been
very difficult for New Zealanders to have confidence in
their capital markets since then. We need to grow our
capital markets because that’s how our companies get the
opportunity for more capital, to grow further, to add more
jobs. So I’m hopeful that the mixed-ownership model with
the opportunity to list those companies, which would be
strong companies in the New Zealand environment, that’s an
opportunity to actually strengthen the capital markets and
get more Kiwis
interested—
SHANE
You mentioned surplus, and that was another
commitment that you made at the last election – to take us
back to surplus in 2014/15.
STEVEN
That’s
correct.
SHANE But Alan
Bollard now says your growth isn’t good enough to keep
that core promise.
STEVEN
Well—
SHANE
Does that hurt you? It’s got to
hurt.
STEVEN No, I
don’t think at all, because, actually, we
remain—
SHANE
But that was a key promise.
STEVEN And it remains
a key promise. I mean, just because one forecast— even
the Reserve Bank comes out one week and says they’re
worried about it doesn’t mean that the government
doesn’t stay focused on its agenda. Otherwise
you—
SHANE But
the Prime Minister says he’s not
confident.
STEVEN Well,
no, the Prime Minister said that he is confident on the
current setting to get us to 14/15, but we’ve all said all
the way through, in fact, that if the bottom fell out of
Europe, well, then that would be a different story, because
then it could perhaps become destructive to do it But just
remember this: the world is becoming more allergic to
sovereign debt than it has in the past, and it’s happening
on a, you know— Every few months they downgrade more
banks, downgrade more sovereign economies, and that’s
because debt, as I say, it’s something that’s a bit more
allergic than it was five years ago. Now, the Government
is focused on getting back into surplus to make sure that we
keep our sovereign debt down – what we owe the rest of the
world. And since we’ve come into office, how much we owe
the rest of the world has dropped from 85% of GDP to now
nearly 70% of GDP.
SHANE We have to wrap
up, but before we go—
STEVEN
So that’s good progress, and we’re going to
continue to focus on that, but the vagaries
of—
SHANE We
take your point, but before we go, because there’s growing
concern— Just before we go, there’s growing concern
amongst our police over their pay, and I want to know
whether they’re going to get—
STEVEN
You’re getting a little beyond my
portfolios at this point, but,
again—
SHANE
But you are Associate Finance Minister.
STEVEN That’s true,
but let me take you through this. Again, New Zealand has
to cut its cloth to actually meet what it actually affords
to buy in the world. So you have your Lucy Lawlesses on
saying we need to
stop—
SHANE
Let’s talk about the
police—
STEVEN No,
no—
SHANE The
police—
STEVEN No,
let me finish.
SHANE
You haven’t even mentioned the police
yet—
STEVEN No, let
me tell you—
SHANE
Let’s get your answer on the police.
STEVEN No, let me take
you through it, because there’s no answer that’s
independent of these other answers. Because the reality is
you need to grow the economy to actually create more income
to pay for the public services. And in the meantime,
things are going to be tight because, actually, we’re
spending more than we’re earning. We have for some
time.
SHANE So
no increase?
STEVEN We
have to actually balance it. I’m not saying about no
increase with the police. What I’m saying is that every
government agency, every public service is dependent on how
strongly we grow the economy forward, and that means taking
advantage of all the opportunities we have, and, frankly,
that includes intensification of agriculture, it includes
oil and gas, it includes clean tech and high-tech
industries, and that’s what we’re focused
on.
SHANE And we have to
leave it there. Minister, thank you very much for your
time.
ENDS
Gordon Campbell: On Pauline Hanson’s Rise, And The TOP Renaissance
Hapai Te Hauora: New Online Gambling Laws Could Grow Harm While Claiming To Reduce It
New Zealand Alliance Party: Alliance Party Firmly Opposes “Backdoor Privatisation” Of Kiwibank
Taxpayers' Union: New Poll - Coalition Still Ahead; Luxon Regains 'Preferred Prime Minister' Top-Spot
NZ National Party: Judith Collins’ Valedictory Speech
Forest And Bird: Government Biodiversity Credit Scheme Welcomed As Opportunity For Restoration
Office of the Ombudsman: Ombudsman Publishes Findings On Ministry Of Education Sensitive Claims Scheme

