Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 


Clients disadvantaged by going it alone


Brokers and clients disadvantaged by clients navigating the ‘minefield’ of credit reporting alone

22 November 2012

Brokers who don’t have contact with a reputable credit rating repairer to refer bad credit clients to, may be missing out on valuable commission through lost deals, and in some cases may also be doing their clients a disservice, says a leading credit rating repairer and advocate for credit reporting accuracy.

CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs, Graham Doessel says whilst many people whose credit history shows up with defaults have obtained that default justly, there are also many whose credit file contains errors and omissions and he says those people should be given the chance to clear their name.

“I would like to say it is as easy as calling the Creditor to sort out the mix-up, but in reality clearing bad credit is a minefield, and a credit rating repairer can be invaluable,” Mr Doessel says.

Generally when a client presents to a broker with bad credit they have two options:

(1) Send them packing to resolve the mix-up or to wait until the credit listing “falls off” their credit file in 5 or 7 years before they apply again.

(2) Organise a non-conforming loan at a higher interest rate to absorb the risk associated with lending to those with bad credit.

When faced with a credit rating error, Mr Doessel says the clients who are sent away may not always be able to resolve their credit reporting dispute themselves.

“Credit reporting is governed by mountains of legislation across different industries, so it is not always about right or wrong, but how the letter of the law applies in each case. We have seen many clients who are defaulted despite doing the right thing and despite working actively to try and resolve the situation themselves,” he says.

He says many brokers put credit repair in the “too hard” basket and prefer to steer their clients to the non-conforming market – at least for the first few years of the loan when they can then refinance.

“There are a couple of reasons why a non-conforming loan will not always be the best choice for the client. Firstly, they can lose thousands on interest even over the first three years, and secondly with the market the way it’s been more home owners are stuck, finding they can’t refinance due to lack of equity in the home,” he explains.

Mr Doessel wants to help educate brokers and consumers alike on some of the myths surrounding credit files:
1. Consumers always know they have bad credit before they apply for a loan.

There can be many reasons for people not to know they have bad credit until they apply for a loan. They may have moved, been hospitalised, been an identity theft victim or even been a victim of error with their creditor. If the client was not notified prior to the default, in many instances the listing has been placed on the credit file unlawfully, and should be disputed.
2. Credit file listings are always correctly placed on credit files.

Credit reporting mistakes can and do happen –but most consumers are unable to recognise credit file errors. Some estimates point to as many as 34% of credit files containing errors or omissions. [i]

Credit reporting agency Veda Advantage recently admitted about 1% of material errors detected by their system alone.[ii] But many more may go undetected by credit reporting agencies, creditors and consumers until it’s too late and the consumer is refused a home loan.
3. Credit file complaints are easily disputed.

Some brokers assume if the listing is there – the client must be deserving of it. But in reality, once a listing has been placed on a credit file, it is very difficult for individuals to have removed. So even if the listing shouldn’t be there, most often people are forced to put up with it. Often they are told the listing can be marked as paid, but will not be removed from the credit file.
4. If a Default or Clear-out is on the credit file it can never be removed prior to the end date.

Some brokers assume credit repair must be a ‘con’, as in their experience listings are never removed. In truth, unless the client can show why the listing was placed unlawfully on the credit file it will not be removed. It is up to the client (or the credit repairer acting on their behalf) to show reason as to why the listing was placed unlawfully, and negotiate its removal.

The process of credit repair involves an audit-like investigation of the entire case to determine, based on legislation whether the credit listing was placed unlawfully on the credit file. If this is determined, the credit repairer will formally negotiate the removal of the listing from the credit file on the client’s behalf.
5. A bad credit client should be steered to the non-conforming market.

If a broker considers duty of care to their client, and they believe the client should be able to obtain mainstream credit, except for bad credit history – then another step must be inserted in the process – deciding on the possible validity of the bad credit before providing non-conforming finance options to them.

“As a successful broker in the non-conforming market for many years, with many cases I was left scratching my head as to why these perfectly suitable clients who had nothing wrong bar their credit rating errors did not have other options than to enter a loan at sky-high interest rates just to break in to the property market. That is precisely why I founded a credit repair business in the first place,” Mr Doessel says.
6. Credit repair is a waste of money.

If a potential borrower is able to have their unfair credit listing removed, they can reduce their interest charges by thousands just by entering a loan with a mainstream lender.

On a loan amount of $350,000, a borrower would pay $487.62 more in interest each month over the first three years in a non-conforming loan at 9% interest vs the standard variable rate of say 7%.

When we look at that in total, the borrower would be up for a staggering $17,554.34 more just in interest alone over those first three years.
7. All credit repairers are the same

Consumers do need to be aware there are some agencies out there who are happy to take money, but don’t add enough benefit to be of value over what an individual could do themselves. People looking for a reputable credit repairer should ask plenty of questions, do their homework on the company, and request some testimonials from past clients before they commit.

/ENDS.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Statistics: Net Annual Migration Passes 71,000

A record 71,300 more migrants arrived in New Zealand than left in the January 2017 year, Statistics New Zealand said today. This surpassed the previous annual record set in December 2016. More>>

ALSO:

Fossils: Ancient Penguins Lived Alongside Dinosaurs?

Penguins are much older than previously thought and their evolution probably dates back to the days of the dinosaurs, according to research on the fossilised leg bone and toes of a giant ancient penguin found in rocks near Waipara, North Canterbury. More>>

No Voda/Sky: Commission Declines Clearance For Merger

The Commerce Commission has declined to grant clearance for the proposed merger of Sky Network Television and Vodafone New Zealand. More>>

ALSO:

EARLIER:

Power: IEA Report On New Zealand's Energy System

Outside of its largely low-carbon power sector, managing the economy’s energy intensity and greenhouse gas emissions while still remaining competitive and growing remains a challenge. More>>

ALSO:

NASA: Seven Earth-Size Planets Around A Single Star

NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has revealed the first known system of seven Earth-size planets around a single star. Three of these planets are firmly located in the habitable zone, the area around the parent star where a rocky planet is most likely to have liquid water. More>>

ALSO:

Auckland Transport Case: Men Guilty Of Corruption And Bribery Will Spend Time In Jail

Two men who were found guilty of corruption and bribery in a Serious Fraud Office (SFO) trial have been sentenced in the Auckland High Court today... The pair are guilty of corruption and bribery offences relating to more than $1 million of bribes which took place between 2005 and 2013 at Rodney District Council and Auckland Transport. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news