Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

UPDATED: Bid for smaller Fonterra board fails

UPDATED: Fonterra shareholders turn down bid for smaller board

(Updates, recasts with final vote on board resolution, added comment)

By Fiona Rotherham

Nov. 25 (BusinessDesk) - Fonterra Cooperative Group shareholder support for a proposal to reduce the board size was evenly split and has led to the company acknowledging change is needed sooner rather than later in its governance and representation.

A total of 53.8 percent of shareholders voted in favour of the resolution put forward by former directors Colin Armer and Greg Gent to cut the board size from 13 to nine directors but it required 75 percent support to get it across the line under the cooperative’s constitution. It also needed support from 50 percent of shareholder councillors.

The resolution was opposed by the board and Shareholders’ Council, who both said a governance review already under way was a better option. Shareholders have been told the review will see an information booklet sent to them early next year, farmer consultations in February, and a May/June vote at a special extraordinary meeting.

In a statement, Armer said the Shareholders' Council had been "found wanting and totally misread farmers' views" on Fonterra's governance. "Their criticism of our proposal was absurd."

Gent said he was still happy with the outcome of the vote and the big turnout showed that a clear majority of shareholders wanted the board to do something now. There had been hot debate on the issue which the two former directors were pushing because they want to see a “fitter, leaner, more agile Fonterra”, saying the move would improve board efficiency and decision-making.

“I haven’t heard anyone say they don’t support a smaller board but they didn’t support the process we put forward,” he said.

Many shareholders expressed concern the move could affect continuity and be disruptive at the top level of the business.

Armer questioned why the governance review, first promised at an annual meeting three years ago and then sidelined, had been so hastily resumed once the resolution was put forward. He also said the board had misrepresented the resolution in the board papers by saying it would involve all directors standing down at once when in fact independent directors would remain in place to ensure continuity.

Director Malcolm Bailey said external advice and a lot of work had been done on the governance review and had been ready to take it to farmers for consultation, but the botulism scare occurred and the decision was made to shelve it for awhile.

“We felt there was no burning platform but it is clear from this that there is a roughly 50:50 split from shareholders on this and we now have to find a way to bring you all back together and find a proposal that can get wider support,” he said.

Chairman John Wilson said the board had started work on the governance review in 2012/2013 and he was “passionate” about the issue. He said it had been good to see the shareholder enthusiasm in the room over governance and he hoped that would lead to a good quality conversation continuing during the review process next year.

He said while a lot of work had already been done, including advice from outside consultants, the review would be refreshed, given the changes in the global dairy market including the supply and demand imbalance and lower dairy prices.

(BusinessDesk)

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Ground Rules: Government Moves To Protect Best Growing Land

“Continuing to grow food in the volumes and quality we have come to expect depends on the availability of land and the quality of the soil. Once productive land is built on, we can’t use it for food production, which is why we need to act now.” More>>

ALSO:

Royal Society: Calls For Overhaul Of Gene-Technology Regulations

An expert panel considering the implications of new technologies that allow much more controlled and precise ‘editing’ of genes, has concluded it’s time for an overhaul of the regulations and that there’s an urgent need for wide discussion and debate about gene editing... More>>

ALSO:

Retail: Card Spending Dips In July

Seasonally-adjusted electronic card spending dipped in July by 0.1 percent after being flat in June, according to Stats NZ. Economists had expected a 0.5 percent lift, according to the median in a Bloomberg poll. More>>

ALSO:

Product Stewardship: Govt Takes More Action To Reduce Waste

The Government is proposing a new way to deal with environmentally harmful products before they become waste, including plastic packing and bottles, as part of a wider plan to reduce the amount of rubbish ending up in landfills. More>>

ALSO:

Earnings Update: Fonterra Sees Up To $675m Loss On Writedowns

“While the Co-op’s FY19 underlying earnings range is within the current guidance of 10-15 cents per share, when you take into consideration these likely write-downs, we expect to make a reported loss of $590-675 million this year, which is a 37 to 42 cent loss per share." More>>

ALSO: