Charles CHAUVEL
Justice Spokesperson

29 September 2011

Labour sets out position on Video Search and Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Bill

Labour’s Justice spokesperson Charles Chauvel has set out the party’s position on the Video Search and Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Bill, and the bottom line amendments it will require National to agree to if it is to obtain Labour’s support in Parliament next week.

“Labour insisted on a public select committee process on the Bill. The hearings were shorter than we would have liked. But at least MPs heard from some experts and from members of the public We were able to test the claims made by Ministers for the necessity for the Bill, and determine whether or not the draft put forward by the Government is appropriate.

“Labour members thank all those who gave evidence to the select committee. The evidence was more or less universally damning of the legislation. Time and time again, witnesses such as the Law Commission, the New Zealand Law Society, the Criminal Bar Association, and the Human Rights Commission referred to the Bill as far too broad, and called for it to be radically amended.

“The New Zealand Police and the New Zealand Police Association agreed that the important thing that was needed above all was as to certainty about their powers going forward.

“Labour regrets that National failed to provide the Police with this clarity by progressing the Search and Surveillance Bill in this Parliament, for which we offered our support last November, and as to which we received no response.

“Having heard the evidence, Labour now sets out its position on the Bill and the amendments that National will be required to agree if it is to have Labour support to pass the House next week:

1. In order to allow the Police to resume covert video surveillance from the date of the Bill’s assent, their powers to do so must be affirmed, but only on the basis of the law as it was understood prior to the Hamed decision, no more broadly than that, and only on the basis of the most serious offending. Labour would have liked the Bill to go further, and provide a warranting procedure, but accepts that the Government left the drafting exercise needed too late to make this happen;

2. The legislation needs to apply for a maximum of 6 months only;.

3. Cases currently under investigation, whether or not yet before the courts, must not be interfered with by Parliament. The Courts must be left free to determine under existing law whether evidence gathered in support of any such prosecutions is admissible. The overwhelming evidence before the committee is that s30 Evidence Act and s21 NZ Bill of Rights Act give the courts this power, and that there is no justification for Parliament to try to intervene. Claims that serious crime will go unpunished have been shown to be misguided. We are satisfied that serious crime will not go unpunished because appropriate safeguards already exist to prevent this;

4. It must be made clear that persons convicted in cases where covert video surveillance was used in the past cannot now seek to overturn their convictions, or seek compensation from the Crown for wrongful conviction or imprisonment, only by reason of the use of covert video surveillance. In other words, the law that applied at the time of conviction must clearly continue to apply, rather than the conviction being measured against a later standard.

“If Chris Finlayson’s current bill, which is drafted much too broadly, is amended in accordance with the above, Labour will support its passage in the House,” Charles Chauvel said.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell: On The New Government’s Policies Of Yesteryear

Winston Peters is routinely described as the kingmaker who decides whether the centre right or the centre-left has a turn at running this country. He also plays a less heralded, but equally important role as the scapegoat who can be blamed for killing taxes that his senior partners never much wanted in the first place. Neither Ardern nor Robertson for example, really wanted a capital gains tax, for fear of Labour copping the “tax and spend“ label they ended up being saddled with anyway. Usefully though, they could tell the party faithful it was wicked old Winston who killed the CGT. More