HappyClappingHomos
once again commends the Maxim Institute for its apparent
failure to grasp the irony of its position. Maxim has paid
tribute this month to the passing of Black civil rights
icon, Rosa Parks. As Maxim rightly say:
"One day an
ordinary lady decided to stand up against the injustice
which she and others suffered. In an act of civil
disobedience, Rosa Parks broke the segregation laws by
refusing to vacate her seat on the bus for a white man,
despite knowing she was likely to face a penalty for
breaking the law."
It begs the question of how the
Institute justifies this homage given its position that
'diversity as a moral imperative reduces freedom';. The
Institute also stated that the law is right to discriminate
against those who do not offer the same benefits to society
as their 'mainstream' counterparts, "To discriminate is to
recognise difference, i.e. to differentiate".
We remind
the Institute that the Alabama State Legislature also
believed that differences between its citizens should be
recognised, and that those who were recognised, as being
"different" did not offer the same benefits to society.
Interestingly enough, inter-racial marriages were
recognised (or rather not) in the same way in Alabama, such
relationships were punishable by a prison term not exceeding
3 years for those involved.
It is ironic that the
segregation that Parks fought against and became a symbol
for is exactly the same form of segregation that Maxim would
introduce here based on sexuality and indeed
culturally.
If you're using Scoop for work, your organisation needs to pay a small license fee with Scoop Pro. We think that's fair, because your organisation is benefiting from using our news resources. In return, we'll also give your team access to pro news tools and keep Scoop free for personal use, because public access to news is important!
Winston Peters is routinely described as the kingmaker who decides whether the centre right or the centre-left has a turn at running this country. He also plays a less heralded, but equally important role as the scapegoat who can be blamed for killing taxes that his senior partners never much wanted in the first place. Neither Ardern nor Robertson for example, really wanted a capital gains tax, for fear of Labour copping the “tax and spend“ label they ended up being saddled with anyway. Usefully though, they could tell the party faithful it was wicked old Winston who killed the CGT... More
The National Party claims the new coalition government will be stable, effective, and will deliver for all Kiwis. "Despite the challenging economic environment, New Zealanders can look forward to a better future because of the changes the new Government will make ... We know that, with the right leadership, the right policies, and the right direction, together New Zealanders can make this an even better country," says Christopher Luxon... More
“The new Government’s plan to expand oil and gas exploration is as dangerous as it is unscientific. Whatever you think about the new government, there is simply no mandate to trash the climate. We need to come together to stop them,” says James Shaw. More
MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru. More