International standard for NZ forests
4 November 2010
International standard for NZ
forests
For more information, please contact Colin
Maunder, tel 0274 664 132 or Bill Gilbertson, tel 021 262
8620
New Zealand is hoping to have an international
standard for the management of its plantation forests
approved sometime next year.
The draft standard,
which will apply to all forests with Forest Stewardship
Council (FSC) certification, is now out for public comment.
This follows several months of negotiation between
representatives of the forest workforce, conservation and
outdoor recreation groups, Maori interests and forest
owners.
Project coordinator Colin Maunder says
getting the agreement of such diverse groups has been a big
achievement.
“But we still want input from anyone
with an interest in forestry. It’s a very important part
of the process,” he says.
The FSC offers the
world’s best-known and arguably most rigorous system of
certifying forest management. In affluent overseas markets
its brand appears on everything from office stationery to
designer furniture. Many high-end retailers require the FSC
stamp of approval before stocking products which began life
in a forest.
The council requires owners of
certified forests to manage them in the best interests of
the environment and the community.
“FSC
certification ensures that large areas of indigenous
biodiversity on private land are being actively protected
and enhanced,” Bill Gilbertson of Forest & Bird
says.
“More than a million hectares of plantation
forest in New Zealand are FSC-certified and about 10 per
cent of this area will effectively be in privately-owned
conservation areas. This is in addition to the habitat
provided by plantations to native plants, birds, bats and
invertebrates. It’s a big plus for the New Zealand
environment.”
The draft standard
will, when it is approved, replace an interim one now in
place. Reaching this point hasn’t been easy.
In
2003, negotiations broke down over three issues – the use
of chemicals in forest management, the ability of Maori to
convert manuka scrubland into plantation forest and the
proportion of a holding that must be kept in managed
indigenous vegetation. There was also concern among farm
foresters that FSC paperwork was too onerous for owners of
small forests.
“With goodwill on all sides and by
using a skilled independent facilitator, we have found ways
forward,” Maunder says. “Basically, we’ve made the
rules more flexible without weakening the standards that
make FSC certification meaningful.”
For example,
the standard requires plantation forest owners to manage and
restore an area of native vegetation equal to 10 per cent of
the forest area. This can be readily achieved where forests
are bisected by gullies in native vegetation, or where there
are significant areas of wetland. But where forests have
been planted into former pastureland this can be
impractical.
The standard therefore allows the
forest owner the flexibility to restore an equivalent area
outside the forest unit, but ideally in the same ecological
district, with the approval of a new body known as the
National Initiative. This body will also set up a Chemical
Standing Committee to assess applications to use vertebrate
poisons like 1080 for possum and stoat control.
The
hoops that small forest owners – those with less than 1000
hectares – have to jump through have also been made much
less demanding.
To read the draft standard and to
make a submission, go to
www.nzfoa.org.nz/certification/thestandard. Submissions
close Friday 19
November.
[ends]