Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Consumer NZ Calls On Sky To Help Its Flood-impacted Customers

Some people who lost all their possessions in Cyclone Gabrielle were told by Sky to stump up $260 to cover the cost of their lost Sky Box.

Alternatively, flood victims could avoid the charges by digging their boxes out of their silt-filled properties and returning them to Sky.

“Five separate flooding victims in Hawke’s Bay told us that Sky was insisting they pay $260 for their damaged or missing Sky Boxes,” said Jon Duffy, Consumer chief executive.

Sky's terms and conditions state that customers have to return equipment when they cancel their subscriptions. Under the terms and conditions, customers are liable for any damage to Sky's equipment and are subject to charges if the equipment is lost or damaged.

“While we appreciate that Sky is within its rights to request a return of, or payment for, equipment - when people have lost all of their possessions in a natural disaster it doesn't seem fair to bill them $260 for equipment that’s been buried or washed away in flood waters.”

A sinking feeling

Judy’s Napier house was heavily impacted by flooding.

“Judy told us she would have preferred to pay up the $260, but every cent counted after losing all her possessions, and she had no choice but to dig through the mud to find the box and return it.”

Geraldine, an Eskdale resident, called Sky when she lost all her possessions, including her TV – as she no longer needed a Sky subscription. Sky told Geraldine she would have to pay $260 for damaging the decoder.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Geraldine’s experience with Sky stands out for all the wrong reasons.

“She told us that even dealing with her insurance companies was better than dealing with Sky.”

Luke and his young family used to live next door to Geraldine – Luke’s house was washed about a kilometre away in the floods.

“Luke told us that Sky sent a debt collector to chase him because he didn’t return his Sky Box, but they stopped pursuing him once they understood his situation."

Another Eskdale flood victim, Nicky, told Consumer she is still being hassled by Sky to return her box.

“Nicky told us she will try and dig it up at the weekend – she has tried to reason with Sky, telling them the box will be completely covered in silt, but Sky still want it back.”

An elderly couple from Waiohiki, another suburb where the river burst its banks, has been charged for two Sky Boxes – Sky had a direct debit set up with the couple.

What Sky says

Consumer raised its concerns with Sky and was told flood victims should not have been asked to return the equipment or pay for it.

Sky said it wanted to remedy any of the individual experiences raised, as the experiences sound “out of step” with the way it wants to help affected customers.

“We know mistakes happen, but to continue to demand payment from people who have lost everything, or sending in debt collectors, seems unfair,” said Duffy.

“Aside from the request to pay for these lost boxes – it's troubling that people felt they had to dig through silt to try and retrieve their boxes.

“We are pleased that Sky wants to remedy the issues which were brought to our attention.

“We encourage anyone who has damaged or lost their Sky Box because of Cyclone Gabrielle to let Sky know so it can help them out,” said Duffy.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.