Bill to tackle legal aid
growth passes first reading
Justice Minister
Simon Power is encouraging the public to have their say on a
bill which is designed to get the legal aid growth curve
under control while ensuring access to justice.
The Legal
Assistance (Sustainability) Amendment Bill passed its first
reading in Parliament today and has been sent to the Justice
and Electoral Select Committee for public submissions.
The
bill, along with operational changes already under way
(including the expansion of the Public Defence Service), is
designed to save $138 million over four years by tightening
the eligibility criteria for legal aid, changing how legal
aid services are purchased, and increasing the payment
obligations of legally aided clients.
“This bill is
needed to prevent a $402 million budget blow-out in legal
aid over five years, after legal aid expenditure rose by 55
per cent, from $111 million in 2006/07 to $172 million in
2009/10,” Mr Power said.
“The changes will not affect
cases involving vulnerable parties, care and protection of
children, and serious criminal matters, and will incentivise
parties to resolve more minor matters between themselves
rather than through the courts.”
Mr Power said Budget
2011 included $103.5 million in short-term funding, while
longer-term sustainability issues are addressed, both
through this bill and a wider review of the purpose of legal
aid and associated costs drivers, predominantly in the
Family Court.
Previous announcements on legal aid can be
found here.
If you're using Scoop for work, your organisation needs to pay a small license fee with Scoop Pro. We think that's fair, because your organisation is benefiting from using our news resources. In return, we'll also give your team access to pro news tools and keep Scoop free for personal use, because public access to news is important!
Winston Peters is routinely described as the kingmaker who decides whether the centre right or the centre-left has a turn at running this country. He also plays a less heralded, but equally important role as the scapegoat who can be blamed for killing taxes that his senior partners never much wanted in the first place. Neither Ardern nor Robertson for example, really wanted a capital gains tax, for fear of Labour copping the “tax and spend“ label they ended up being saddled with anyway. Usefully though, they could tell the party faithful it was wicked old Winston who killed the CGT... More
The National Party claims the new coalition government will be stable, effective, and will deliver for all Kiwis. "Despite the challenging economic environment, New Zealanders can look forward to a better future because of the changes the new Government will make ... We know that, with the right leadership, the right policies, and the right direction, together New Zealanders can make this an even better country," says Christopher Luxon... More
“The new Government’s plan to expand oil and gas exploration is as dangerous as it is unscientific. Whatever you think about the new government, there is simply no mandate to trash the climate. We need to come together to stop them,” says James Shaw... More
MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru... More