News Video | Policy | GPs | Hospitals | Medical | Mental Health | Welfare | Search


Sunbeds Not Cool Says Cancer Society

Sunbeds Not Cool Says Cancer Society

It’s a cold hard fact: sunbeds are not cool.

But the message is taking a long time to get through – especially to teenage girls.

With summer holidays around the corner, the Health Sponsorship Council (HSC) and Cancer Society SunSmart partnership is reminding people that it’s not just the sun that that can cause damage leading to skin cancers – not to mention prematurely ageing and disfiguring the skin.

It’s also important people don’t think that they are protecting themselves from damage by getting a “base tan” in a solarium before going outdoors.

“We know from research that many young women think that getting a sunbed tan is safer than getting skin damage from the sun. They’re certainly not currently being told any different as the results of a recent Consumers Institute survey demonstrate,”

says SunSmart spokesperson Wendy Billingsley.

The Consumers Institute investigated the practices of sunbed operators in New Zealand and the results horrified, but did not surprise the Cancer Society.

Of 30 sunbed outlets visited by the Institute, only two met all the requirements specified in the only solarium Standard available in this country – a voluntary one.

“It is especially important that young women with fair skin are made aware of the risks of UV radiation used in sunbeds because those who are at the highest risk of skin cancer later in life are people who have fair skin which always burns and never tans, and those under the age of 15 who have received large doses of ultraviolet radiation, Ms Billingsley says.

The Cancer Society has renewed calls for a compulsory Standard.

“As Consumer points out, there has been a significant increase in use of sunbeds since 2000 – from five to eight percent with about 40 percent of these sunbed bed users visiting a clinic at least once a fortnight.

“And these are just the kinds of people who could be helped by a compulsory Standard to warn them of the risks,” Ms Billingsley says.

“We recommend those under the age of 15 be banned from solariums and those aged 15 to 18 use a solarium only with parental consent.”

Ms Billingsley says if young women can’t be persuaded by the evidence that the UV-A and UV-B rays emitted by sunbeds can potentially cause skin cancers, the Cancer Society and HSC are just as happy if they stop using them because of the ageing effect on their skin.

“Apart from the risk of skin cancer, over-exposure to UV radiation makes the skin dry, wrinkled and less elastic. It may also cause irregular pigmentation. Once this has happened, no fancy creams can reverse the process. The attraction of a tan pales somewhat when you consider that more and more young people in their teens and 20s are developing leathery, lined skin before their time.”

Studies have shown pre-cancerous conditions have also been found in the sunlight-protected but solarium-exposed skin of fair-skinned users after just two to three years of regular solarium use, Ms Billingsley says.

The risk to eyes highlighted by the Consumer research is also endorsed by Ms Billingsley.

She says acute effects of UV radiation on the eye include photokeratitis (inflammation of the cornea and the iris), and photoconjunctivitis (an inflammation of the conjunctiva). Long-term effects may include the development of cataracts, pterygium (white or creamy opaque growth attached to the cornea), and squamous cell cancer of the conjunctiva.

Ms Billingsley emphasises, no solarium can give a safe tan.

“If people feel they must have a tanned skin to look good, there are plenty of fake tan products that give a realistic look without the risks of skin cancer. We tell sun-bathers to fake it, not bake it. Perhaps for sunbedders it could be: Sham for a safer glam.”

© Scoop Media

Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines


Howard Davis: Emerald Fennell's Promising Young Woman'

The Guardian needed not one, but three reviews to do justice to Fennell's unsettling approach, which indicates exactly how ambiguous and controversial its message really is. More>>

Howard Davis: Jill Trevelyan's Rita Angus

Although Angus has become one of Aotearoa’s best-loved painters, the story of her life remained little known and poorly understood before Jill Trevelyan's acclaimed and revelatory biography, which won the Non Fiction Award at the Montana New Zealand Book Awards in 2009, and has now been republished by Te Papa press. More>>

Howard Davis: The Back of the Painting

Painting conservators are the forensic pathologists of the art world. While they cannot bring their subjects back to life, they do provide fascinating insights into the precise circumstances of a painting's creation, its material authenticity, and constructive methodology. More>>

Howard Davis: Black Panthers on the Prowl

A passionate and gripping political drama from Shaka King, this is an informative and instructive tale of human frailty that centers around the charismatic Chicago Black Panther leader Fred Hampton, who was murdered at the age of twenty-one during a police raid. More>>

Howard Davis: Controlling the High Ground

Stephen Johnson's raw and angry film not only poses important questions with scrupulous authenticity, but also provides a timely reminder of the genocidal consequences of casual bigotry and xenophobia. More>>

Howard Davis: Dryzabone - Robert Conolly's The Dry

After the terrible devastation caused by last year’s bushfires, which prompted hundreds of Australians to shelter in the ocean to escape incineration and destroyed uncountable amounts of wildlife, The Dry has been released during a totally different kind of dry spell. More>>

Howard Davis: Hit the Road, Jack - Chloé Zhao's Nomadland

Nomadland is perhaps the ultimately 'road' movie as it follows a group of dispossessed and disenfranchised vagabonds who find a form of communal refuge in camp sites and trailer parks after the economic contraction of 2008. More>>



  • Wellington
  • Christchurch
  • Auckland