Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Criminal Justice Changes: Jury Trials

FACT SHEET 4: RESTRICTING AVAILABILITY OF JURY TRIALS

What is the general proposal?

Restrict the availability of jury trials to cases that are sufficiently serious to warrant the cost and time they incur by:

Raising the threshold at which a jury trial can be elected to above three years' imprisonment.

Removing the prosecution’s ability to choose jury trial over a judge-alone trial.

Why change the law?

There is little historical justification for the current jury trial threshold. It was originally set at the current level to equate with the threshold in the United Kingdom. However, the threshold there has since changed. By international standards New Zealand’s threshold is low (see the final section below).

At present, the average jury trial takes around 12 months to complete compared with six months for a judge-alone (summary) trial.

Under section 24(3) of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA), a defendant charged with an offence that has a maximum penalty of more than three months' imprisonment has a right to elect jury trial. There are some exceptions to this general rule (eg, common assault and assault against a police office under the Summary Offences Act 1981). Because this threshold is so low it covers a very broad range of minor offences (eg, theft of property valued between $500 and $1,000). This type of offending does not warrant the time and resource that is required for a jury trial.

There is no reason in principle why the prosecution should be able to choose the form of trial. (In 2007, about 52,000 cases fell within the category of cases in which the prosecution could choose the form of trial. The prosecution chose the jury trial process in 3,600 of these cases, or around 7% of the time. Around 1,000 of these cases were committed for trial and about a third of these actually had a jury trial).

A fair trial is just as likely to occur before a judge alone as before a jury. There is currently a low rate of election in low-level cases.

The nature or seriousness of the offence should be reflected in the way the trial is conducted – that is, the more serious the offence and potential penalty, the more appropriate it is for that matter to be considered by a jury.

How?

There will no longer be a category of cases for which the prosecution can choose the form of trial. (Refer Fact Sheet 3: Categorisation of Offences and Case Progression). Section 24(e) of the NZBORA will be amended to raise the threshold at which a defendant can elect jury trial to offences where the maximum penalty is above three years' imprisonment.

Benefits of proposal

These changes are expected to result in 1,000 to 1,400 fewer cases needing to be designated for trial by jury and 300 to 600 fewer cases ( a reduction of 25-45%) that actually proceed to a jury trial (from a base of approximately 1,300 cases disposed at jury trial in 2008).

Though some of the capacity freed as a result of the reduction in jury trials would be taken up by the judge-alone trials required in these cases, it is estimated that the value of savings would still be significant.

Because the jury trial process is longer than the judge-alone process (refer Fact Sheet 3: Categorisation of Offences and Case Progression) the cases no longer subject to this process will be resolved sooner.

International comparisons

In Australia, though there are variations from state to state, the jury threshold typically ranges from one to two years’ imprisonment, but New South Wales has a threshold of five years.

In Canada, the Canadian Charter guarantees the right to a jury trial if the maximum penalty is five years’ imprisonment or more.

In the United Kingdom the right to jury trial is available only for prosecutions for offences tried on indictment.

In the United States the right to a jury trial is restricted to offences that carry a sentence of above six months' imprisonment.

The threshold in the NZBORA goes beyond what is required of New Zealand under its international human rights obligations.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Next Governor-General

The next Governor-General will have to be named quite soon. Dame Patsy Reddy (appointed 2016) is nearing the end of her five-year term. At the best of times, being a credible local stand-in for a head of state that’s based in London cannot be an easy job. Yet for the next appointee, the usual republican rumblings will be the least of it. The next G-G will almost certainly be in office when the Elizabeth II era finally comes to an end, and when the reign of her deeply uncharismatic son gets under way... More>>


 
 

Office Of The Speaker: 2021 Register Of Pecuniary And Other Specified Interests Presented

The 2021 Register of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests of Members of Parliament was presented to the House today. It contains a summary of members’ pecuniary and other specified interests as at 31 January 2021. The Speaker of the House, Rt Hon ... More>>

Budget 2021: Boosts Carbon Neutral Government Commitment

· Budget 2021 delivers $67.4 million to support the transition to a carbon neutral public sector by 2025 · State Sector Decarbonisation Fund receives significant boost to support more schools, hospitals and other government organisations to replace ... More>>

Government: To Rev Up Reductions In Transport Emissions

The Government is calling for feedback on a range of potential policies to eliminate emissions in the transport sector. Transport Minister Michael Wood today released Hīkina te Kohupara – Kia mauri ora ai te iwi - Transport Emissions: Pathways to ... More>>

Child Poverty: Reports Highlight Need For Ongoing Action

The Government has released the first Annual Report for the Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy and the second Child Poverty Related Indicators (CPRI) Report, both of which highlight improvements in the lives of children as a result of actions of the Government, ... More>>

ALSO:

PM: Statement On The Speaker And Annual Review Debate

“The serious issue of alleged sexual assault and harassment at Parliament was poorly managed and inappropriately politicised last night. The tone of the debate did not reflect well on Parliament as a whole,” Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said. ... More>>

Local Government: Independent Review To Explore Future

Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta says an independent review of local government will explore how councils can maintain and improve the wellbeing of New Zealanders in the communities they serve long into the future. More>>

ALSO:


 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels