Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

New employment law would stop Affco serial litigation: Union

New employment law would stop costly serial litigation from Affco, Meat Workers Union says

By Sophie Boot

May 16 (BusinessDesk) - The Meat Workers Union says changes to New Zealand's employment law would let them prevent Talleys-owned meat processor Affco from barring unions and taking bargaining to court, a tactic which costs the workers' advocate half a million dollars a year in legal fees.

The Employment Relations Amendment Bill, which is currently being heard by a parliamentary select committee, would drop changes made by the previous government to key minimum standards and protections for employees, including restricting the use of 90-day trials to employers with fewer than 20 employees, and would strengthen collective bargaining and union rights in the workplace.

The union and Affco have been tied up in the courts for years, with the meat processor the first company to apply for an end to bargaining under legislative changes introduced in 2015 which let firms opt out of multi-employer agreements and removed the duty under good faith bargaining for both sides to reach a deal. Affco mounted continuous legal challenges but was rejected by every court, with the Supreme Court finding in September that the meat processor unlawfully locked out meat workers when collective bargaining was taking place.

Since 2012, the litigation has cost the union about $500,000 per year, the union's director of organising Darien Fenton told the select committee this morning.

"We're up against a $300 million company, and we don't believe they should have the competitive advantage of treating their workers the way they do. It undercuts everybody, it creates a race to the bottom."

Fenton said the new bill wasn't radical legislation, just re-setting to previous conditions and removing an uneven playing field. She rejected claims the bill will lead to further strikes, saying the meat industry hadn't had a strike since 1999, and "the only radical industrial action we've seen in the meat industry in the last 10 years has been the unlawful lockouts by Affco Talleys, and there's been several of them."

"In the rest of the meat industry we have good relationships. We have collective agreements right across the industry, we have thousands of members, we have regular negotiations and we haven't had a strike in years," Fenton said.

"The union has had to spend a lot of members' resources - and these are not wealthy members, these are people working seasonal jobs out in small towns who are lucky sometimes if they get to work six months in the year. We've had to use their funds to mount a legal defence against one company. You might like to ask a question about why that is."

Last week, Affco made a submission to the select committee, in which it opposed the bill, saying it "takes away employer flexibility, seeks to force common provisions and terms and conditions on all parties, excessively complicates the process for determining a new employees’ terms and conditions, undermines health and safety obligations and otherwise hinders efficiency, productivity and the employees’ own working success."

National Party MP Scott Simpson said Affco had told the committee the industry had seen a "rapid rate of automation" over the past 10 or 20 years, and if the bill is passed, they may automate further to continue to deliver returns to shareholders.

However, the union's national secretary Graham Cooke denied there had been rapid automation so far and said automation wasn't that simple in the meat industry, though accepted it will eventually happen.

Cooke said Affco was the only company in the industry to restrict union access, and union density in all Affco plants had dropped to 10 percent by last year from 95 percent in 2010.

The select committee's report on the bill is due by Aug. 1, after which it will have its second reading.

(BusinessDesk)


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

You'd Hope: Employers Told To Pay Minimum Wage

Advertisers offering jobs to backpackers are being told they must pay the minimum wage or risk prosecution. Last week, RNZ revealed a job website - Backpackerboard - was advertising roles below the $16.50 per hour minimum wage. More>>

ALSO:

Still Gaining: More Migrants Head Back Overseas

Annual net migration is down 4,800 from a high point a year ago, largely because more non-New Zealand citizens are leaving the country, Stats NZ said today. More>>

Christchurch: Red Zone Used To Boost Endangered Bee Population

“May 20 has been declared World Bee Day by the United Nations, and I am pleased to announce today that we have been able to use the red zone to protect and grow our native bee stocks,” says Minister Megan Woods. More>>

Trips, Support, Conferences For Agents: Insurers Spend $34 Million On Soft Commissions

“We are concerned that insurers are designing and offering incentives that potentially set advisers up to fail in complying with their obligations.” More>>

ALSO:

Privacy Commissioner: Facial Recognition Tech Not Reliable

The Privacy Commissioner says businesses should take great care when using facial recognition technology because there is a high risk of misidentification. More>>

Compliance Costs: Cheesemakers "Have A Reason To Smile"

Delighted to be a guest at The Great Eketahuna Cheese Festival today, Mr O’Connor launched the Food Safety Template for Cheesemakers – a tool to help cheesemakers producing cheese for New Zealand and Australia to meet food safety requirements. More>>