Mass Shootings: Australian Gun Bans Not the Answer
The International Coalition for Women in Shooting and
Hunting (WiSH) have issued the following
release:
Media Release June 5 2011
Mass Shootings: Australian Gun Bans Not the Answer
New research shows that Australia’s costly ban on semi-automatic firearms cannot be credited with stopping mass shootings in that country. Published in the peer-reviewed Justice Policy Journal, the study compared the occurrence of mass shootings (four or more people killed) in Australia with its close neighbour New Zealand.
“Despite their very different gun laws,
both countries have experienced almost identical periods of
time with no mass shootings,” said WiSH Chair Dr Samara
McPhedran.
In reaction to the Port Arthur mass
shooting in 1996, Australia banned semi-automatic rifles and
shotguns, and pump-action shotguns. New Zealand still
allows those types of firearms for hunting and target
shooting. Neither country has experienced a mass shooting
in over 14 years.
“This does not support the view that prohibiting certain types of firearms explains the absence of mass shootings in Australia since 1996,” said Dr McPhedran.
Although mass shootings have historically
been extremely rare in both Australia and New Zealand, there
was a ‘cluster’ of shootings in both countries in the
late 1980s to mid-1990s.
In the late 1980s and early
1990s, both countries experienced high levels of
unemployment, followed by a decade of relative economic
stability and growth from the mid-1990s onward.
Dr
McPhedran said that “The occurrence of mass shootings may
reflect broader relationships between economic wellbeing and
violence.”
The study controlled for different
population sizes between the two countries.
Executive summary:
http://www.ic-wish.org/Mass%20shootings%20in%20Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%20Executive%20Summary.pdf