Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

CT v The Queen - indecency convictions quashed

30 October 2014

MEDIA RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION

CT (SC 88/2013) v THE QUEEN

(SC 88/2013) [2014] NZSC 155

PRESS SUMMARY

This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at www.courtsofnz.govt.nz.

Following a jury trial in the District Court, the appellant was found guilty on two counts: one count of indecent assault and one representative count of inducing an indecent act.

The case against the appellant related to events in the early 1970s. The complainant complained to the police in August 2007 and the appellant was charged in March 2012, around 40 years after the alleged offending.

In the District Court, the appellant twice sought a stay of proceedings on the basis of forensic prejudice caused by delay. Both applications required the trial Judge to determine whether the appellant could receive a fair trial despite the delay.

The first stay application was made before the appellant’s trial commenced. He complained of the pre-charge delay and contended that it would be impossible for him to have a fair trial which met the requirements of s 25(a) of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. The Judge dismissed the application and the trial commenced.

At trial, the complainant’s evidence differed significantly from the narrative recorded in her committal statement. This resulted in amendments to the indictment and prompted a second application for a stay of proceedings by the appellant, this time at the end of the Crown case. The trial Judge also dismissed this second application and the appellant was ultimately convicted on two counts.

The appellant appealed against his convictions on the basis that there had been a miscarriage of justice within the meaning of s 385(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1961. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. The appellant sought and was granted leave to appeal to this Court.

The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal and ordered that the convictions of the appellant are quashed.

The Court has held that, while the trial Judge was correct to refuse the first stay application, given the variances between the complainant’s committal statement and evidence at trial, the resulting need for a re-writing of the indictment and, most particularly, the difficulty in being confident as to what offending happened in which locations, the second stay application should have been granted.

The Court has also held that, even if the trial Judge had been correct to dismiss the second stay application, in light of s 122(2)(e) of the Evidence Act 2006, the directions given to the jury were insufficient to overcome the risk of unfairness in the trial arising from the effect of delay. While agreeing that the warning given by the trial Judge was inadequate, Glazebrook and Arnold JJ have issued separate reasons on this point as they have taken a different view of the scope of s 122(2)(e).

As a result, the appeal is allowed and the convictions of the appellant are quashed. Given the Court’s conclusion that the second stay application should have been granted, it is not appropriate to direct a retrial.

[Judgment: SC_88_2013__CT_v_The_Queen.pdf]


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On Compensating Afghan Civilian Casualties

Reportedly, there have been nine incidents resulting in 17 civilian deaths and injuries (seven of the dead were children) caused by ordnance left behind on what used to be the firing range of our Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Bamiyan province.

Given that the NZ Defence Force has needed to be hauled kicking and screaming into belatedly arranging an adequate clean-up of its old firing range… what would it take before New Zealand offers to pay compensation to the families of those who suffered death and injury from what was left behind on our watch? More>>

 

Predator Free: $3.5m For New Pest Controls

New Zealand First is proud to announce the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) has allocated $3.5 million to develop innovative predator control approaches which will reduce the need for repeated 1080 use. More>>

ALSO:

Children's Day: Commissioner Calls For Govt Commitment

“Three decades on, we are able to celebrate some significant changes for children like the recent launch of a Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy. But we still have a long way to go to prioritise children’s rights.” More>>

ALSO:

Elections: Proposed Electorate Boundaries Released

The Representation Commission is proposing changes to half of New Zealand’s electorates and establishing a new electorate in south Auckland… More>>

ALSO:

"Effectively A Permanent Amnesty": Final Month For Gun Ban Compensation

The firearms buy-back comes to an end a month from today, but the police say the amnesty for returning banned guns will continue into next year and beyond. More>>

ALSO:


SPECIAL GUNS FOR FOREIGN SECURITY:


MORE ARMED POLICE:

Overseas Investment Rules: New National Interest Test

The Government is delivering on its promise to protect New Zealanders’ interests by applying a new national interest test to the sales of our most sensitive and high risk assets to overseas buyers... More>>

ALSO:

Matter Of Trust: Peters Says NZ First Loans Legal

"Allegations raised this morning by Stuff Limited / Fairfax concern a party matter but I am confident that New Zealand First has operated within electoral laws, now and for the last 27 years." More>>

ALSO:

PGF CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels