Restructuring Risks Undermining Export Reputation
GE Free New Zealand In Food And Environment
GE Free New Zealand PRESS RELEASE –7.11.03
Restructuring Risks Undermining NZ Export Reputation
Restructuring by AgResearch could undermine the standards of oversight for animal health in New Zealand and threaten our reputation overseas.
Ensuring animal health is vital for our export image. Government support for the diagnostic and control research of disease at AgResearch must be the aim for publicly funded research.
In the event of new diseases emerging, a good diagnostic and response unit is essential. Recent incidents of diseases include the 'provisionally confirmed' post-weaning multi-specific wasting syndrome (PMWS) an 'exotic' pig disease and Mycoplasma mycoides in cattle . The latter is apparently a less virile version of other related diseases, some of which are of serious concern worldwide.
With the increased incidence of transgenic GE animals being developed in New Zealand using human and other genes, the spectre of new pathogens emerging cannot be ignored. These experiments make it even more important that New Zealand is protected by a sophisticated and properly funded system to identify diseases.
" We are concerned that once again New Zealand is being sold-short. We are told we have the best standards in the world, but ongoing dismantling of them and breaches that ERMA and MAF have failed to prevent risks that reputation," says Jon Carapiet from GE Free NZ in food and environment.
In order to maintain public confidence in our exports it is vital to have research that routinely establishes good animal health. Unfortunately, even with the long-running GE sheep trials the standards have not been met. Illness in some of these animals has gone un-investigated and the restructuring of the organisation now going on seems to do nothing except make matters worse.
Crown Research Institute AgResearch, partially
publicly funded, is actively involved in GE experimentation
with cows, and collaborates with overseas research partners.
Their spin-off stand-alone company Celentis, takes research
to commercialisation reaping any financial benefits.
Reportedly many scientists at AgResearch have been unhappy
about the focus on GE, but would no doubt be censored if
they were to speak out.
ENDS………… Jon Carapiet 09 815 3370
AgResearch move no longer certain
07 November 2003
By RICHARD TROW
AgResearch's restructuring plans at Wallaceville might change, with a move to Dunedin no longer a certainty.
The plan to move the world-leading team of 24 fertility scientists to AgResearch's centre at Invermay has proved hugely unpopular, and is almost certain to lead to the team's breakup, with up to 17 key staff already rushing for the exit.
But cracks are appearing in the strategy, as the Government realises the potential harm to New Zealand research if the scientists leave. Several are known to be negotiating with overseas companies.