Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Bluegreens Slam Minister’s Whangamata Decision

8 March 2006

Bluegreens Slam Minister’s Whangamata Decision as “Constitutional Outrage”

Minister of Conservation Chris Carter’s decision to overturn the Environment Court’s decision to allow for a marina at Whangamata is a constitutional outrage, said Andrew von Dadelszen, the national convenor of Bluegreens, a policy group that advises the National Party on environment, conservation, outdoor recreation and heritage issues.

“This application for a resource consent to construct a marina at Whangamata had gone through an incredibly complex process of public consultation and input, and for the Minister to overrule it through his veto power smacks of dictatorship at its worst,” said Mr von Dadelszen. “The Resource Management Act is extremely rigorous, and this application took many years to progress through due process, and was finally approved by the Environment Court after a 27-day hearing.”

Mr von Dadelszen, who is also an Environment Bay of Plenty regional councillor, said he is outraged at the cavalier manner in which this Labour Party Minister has flouted the rule of law. He acknowledges the Minister’s right of veto, but notes that in nine years (and 126 decisions) throughout the 1990’s the then National Party Minister of Conservation, Hon Dr Nick Smith never once used “this draconian power of veto.”

“Bluegreens see this veto as just another case of ‘mother knows best’ that is the hallmark of the present government. We have a robust process within the RMA to protect our environment and ensure sustainability, and we don’t need political interference to intercede on behalf of vested interests,” said Mr von Dadelszen.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Charlotte Graham: Empowering Communities To Act In A Disaster

The year of record-breaking natural disasters means that in the US, as in New Zealand, there’s a conversation happening about how best to run the emergency management sector and what philosophies best engage and protect communities in the event of a crisis.

How much of the responsibility for a community’s safety in a natural disaster is the Government’s, and how much can be left up to the community themselves? And how do we ensure none of our most vulnerable residents are left behind? More>>


CPAG Report: The Further Fraying Of The Welfare Safety Net

New Zealand’s welfare system has undergone a major transformation during the past three decades. This process has seriously thwarted the original intent of the system, which was to provide a decent standard of living for all New Zealanders in times of need... More>>


Signage, Rumble Strips, Barriers: Boost For State Highway Road Safety

Boost for road safety this summer Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter today announced a short term boost in road safety funding this summer and signalled a renewed focus from the Government on introducing safer speed limits. More>>


Risks & Adaptation: Cheaper To Cut Emissions Than Deal With Climate Change

The cost of climate change to New Zealand is still unknown, but a group of experts tasked with plugging the country's information gaps says it will likely be significant and it would be cheaper to cut greenhouse emissions than simply adapting to those changes. More>>


BPS HYEFU WYSIWYG: Labour's Budget Plans, Families Package

“Today we are announcing the full details of the Government’s Families Package. This is paid for by rejecting National’s tax cuts and instead targeting spending at those who need it most. It will lift 88,000 children out of poverty by 2021." More>>





Featured InfoPages