Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Caution Needed Around Adventure Tourism Proposals

Tourism operators are managing natural hazard risks within their businesses but some practices could be improved without loading significant cost burdens onto operators, says Tourism Industry Aotearoa.

Chris Roberts

TIA is keen to see stronger leadership and more proactive involvement from WorkSafe, particularly to create more guidance documentation in consultation with the adventure and outdoor sector. There are some other sensible improvements that can be made, but broad changes are not required.

In its submission to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s recent consultation paper on proposed changes to the Adventure Activities Regulatory Regime, TIA says some of the options put out for consideration do not adequately reflect the complexities of adventure activities undertaken in areas of natural hazards.

The review followed the 2019 Whakaari/White Island tragedy and was targeted at the management of natural hazard risks in adventure and outdoor activities. TIA Chief Executive Chris Roberts was Chair of the Expert Reference Group formed by MBIE to inform the review.

The targeted review found that while the adventure activities regulatory regime was performing reasonably well, there were several areas that could be improved, including the management of natural hazards, the role of the regulator and the audit process.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“TIA broadly agrees with this finding, and there are some good suggestions in the document, but we have raised concerns that some of options put forward would be unworkable,” says Mr Roberts.

“For instance, we disagree with making natural hazard management the responsibility of landowners, as this could result in many areas being closed to adventure operators – and also the New Zealand public.”

TIA is not in favour of the creation of a risk classification system and is opposed to any changes to the current audit regime that will result in increased costs to operators.

“Some of these proposals would create a significant chilling effect on the outdoor sector. Costs would increase and it is likely some very good operators would be forced out of business. Let’s make the sensible improvements, while also protecting the viability of businesses already hard-hit by the pandemic”.


To read TIA’s full submission, go to https://www.tia.org.nz/assets/Uploads/Adventure-Activity-Review-Submission-Final-November-4-2021.pdf
 

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
GenPro: General Practices Begin Issuing Clause 14 Notices

GenPro has been copied into a rising number of Clause 14 notices issued since the NZNO lodged its Primary Practice Pay Equity Claim against General Practice employers in December 2023.More

SPADA: Screen Industry Unites For Streaming Platform Regulation & Intellectual Property Protections

In an unprecedented international collaboration, representatives of screen producing organisations from around the world have released a joint statement.More

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.