Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
License needed for work use Register
Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

50/50 split for passenger clearance costs

15 December 2004

50/50 split for passenger clearance costs

The funding of passenger clearance services at New Zealand’s seven international airports will be split around 50/50 with the government contributing $55 million and industry contributing $49 million annually.

Announcing the decision today, Finance Minister Michael Cullen said the funding package had been developed after extensive consultations with key users and stakeholders and had won broad support although there were some areas of disagreement.

Raised security concerns and increasing passenger numbers had created pressure for more intensive and more efficient screening techniques which were expected to raise the cost from $55 million a year to $91 million and to raise industry’s costs by another $14 million a year.

“This addition in costs created the opportunity to review the whole funding system as it is inconsistent and ad hoc in nature with the government recovering some costs but not others and with the systems of cost recovery differing in both purpose and application between the different agencies.

“We have adopted a “primary beneficiary model” in which the costs are allocated according to where the principal benefit is derived,” Dr Cullen said.

“The small modification to this rule is that the government will heavily subsidise rather than fully fund biosecurity and customs services at the regional airports [Hamilton, Palmerston North, Dunedin and Queenstown] where the processing costs per passenger are significantly higher than at the larger metropolitan centres.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

“The small user pays element is designed to send a pricing signal to the travelling public and will be charged to the airlines in the first instance but passed on to passengers through ticket prices,” Dr Cullen said.

Specific decisions are:

That the full cost of aviation security be met by the airlines and passengers as the prime beneficiaries of the service; That there be further consultation with industry early next year regarding how these costs should be allocated across airports; That the government fully fund current biosecurity and customs services at the metropolitan airports [Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch] and fund them at the regional international airports up to the per passenger rate of the third cheapest metropolitan airport and on a dollar for dollar ratio beyond that; That a cap be put on the industry’s contribution at regional airports equivalent to the per passenger rate of the second most expensive regional airport with the government meeting all costs above that level; That any new airport meet the full costs of government services.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On How Climate Change Threatens Cricket‘s Future

Well that didn’t last long, did it? Mere days after taking on what he called the “awesome responsibility” of being Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon has started blaming everyone else and complaining that he's inherited “economic vandalism on an unprecedented scale” - which is how most of us would describe his own coalition agreements, 100-Day Plan, and backdated $3 billion handout to landlords... More


 
 
Public Housing Futures: Christmas Comes Early For Landlords

New CTU analysis of the National & ACT coalition agreement has shown the cost of returning interest deductibility to landlords is an extra $900M on top of National’s original proposal. This is because it is going to be implemented earlier and faster, including retrospective rebates from April 2023. More


Green Party: Petition To Save Oil & Gas Ban

“The new Government’s plan to expand oil and gas exploration is as dangerous as it is unscientific. Whatever you think about the new government, there is simply no mandate to trash the climate. We need to come together to stop them,” says James Shaw. More

PSA: MFAT Must Reverse Decision To Remove Te Reo

MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru. More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.