Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Bank regulation needed to protect consumers

5 November 2018

Consumer NZ wants regulation of the banking industry to be strengthened to protect customers from being sold products they don’t need and that provide poor value. Consumer NZ chief executive Sue Chetwin said the joint review of the industry by the Reserve Bank and Financial Markets Authority showed banks were doing little to monitor whether products were suitable for their customers.

Released today, the review found the risk of customers being mis-sold products was increased by sales incentives offered to staff. Ms Chetwin backed the review’s call for banks to drop incentives tied to sales. “If they’re not going to remove them, they need to show how they can manage the inherent conflicts of interest these inducements create. We doubt they can.”

Regulation to address the “significant weaknesses” in banks’ governance and management of conduct risks is also needed, she said. “The review found many banks were relying on customer complaints to identify problems. But there were serious shortfalls with the complaints systems in some cases. The processes for whistle-blowers to come forward and raise issues were also poor.”

Failures in banks’ management of their processes had resulted in customers being charged interest or fees when they shouldn’t have been. Ms Chetwin said legislative gaps meant regulators weren’t doing the monitoring needed to assess banks’ conduct and give consumers confidence their interests were being protected. Consumer NZ supported recommendations to give regulators stronger monitoring powers and require banks to protect customer interests. “Banks are making record profits. Consumers need to know whether these profits are resulting from the sale of poor value products that may result in customers unnecessarily taking on debt.”

Ms Chetwin said Consumer NZ’s own survey research found one in four consumers had been offered unsolicited products by their bank. “In many cases, the consumer didn’t need or want the product, and you’ve got to question whether the only reason it was offered was because the sales rep had a target to meet.

“Sendsales incentives are not only inconsistent with banks' responsible lending obligations, they expose consumers to the risk they will be sold junk products.”

ends


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 

Ground Rules: Government Moves To Protect Best Growing Land

“Continuing to grow food in the volumes and quality we have come to expect depends on the availability of land and the quality of the soil. Once productive land is built on, we can’t use it for food production, which is why we need to act now.” More>>

ALSO:

Royal Society: Calls For Overhaul Of Gene-Technology Regulations

An expert panel considering the implications of new technologies that allow much more controlled and precise ‘editing’ of genes, has concluded it’s time for an overhaul of the regulations and that there’s an urgent need for wide discussion and debate about gene editing... More>>

ALSO:

Retail: Card Spending Dips In July

Seasonally-adjusted electronic card spending dipped in July by 0.1 percent after being flat in June, according to Stats NZ. Economists had expected a 0.5 percent lift, according to the median in a Bloomberg poll. More>>

ALSO:

Product Stewardship: Govt Takes More Action To Reduce Waste

The Government is proposing a new way to deal with environmentally harmful products before they become waste, including plastic packing and bottles, as part of a wider plan to reduce the amount of rubbish ending up in landfills. More>>

ALSO:

Earnings Update: Fonterra Sees Up To $675m Loss On Writedowns

“While the Co-op’s FY19 underlying earnings range is within the current guidance of 10-15 cents per share, when you take into consideration these likely write-downs, we expect to make a reported loss of $590-675 million this year, which is a 37 to 42 cent loss per share." More>>

ALSO: