Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Repeal Of The Electoral Finance Act

Repeal Of The Electoral Finance Act

BY JOHN BOSCAWEN

Trustee of the Freedom of Speech Trust

10 August 2008


The Freedom of Speech Trust today placed a full page advertisement in The Sunday Star Times and The Herald on Sunday highlighting key issues associated with the Electoral Finance Act and again calling for the repeal of the Act.

John Boscawen said “The Electoral Finance Act imposes a form of election year censorship never seen before in New Zealand.”

“The Act affects all Kiwis as it undermines four cherished democratic rights: the right to hold free and fair elections; the right to exercise free speech; the right to campaign either for or against the government; and the right to be fully informed.”

The Freedom of Speech Trust was formed to campaign against the Electoral Finance Act being passed and since its enactment it has campaigned for its repeal. As the Trust is not seeking to place “election advertisements” which encourage or persuade voters to vote, or not to vote for any particular political party or candidate, it is not required to register as a third party. The Trust has been very careful to ensure that the advertisement placed today complies with the law and there are many things that might have been said, but were not for fear of breaking the law. This is a form of censorship – pure and simple!

“The Act imposes complex and uncertain restrictions on what each of us can say and do in election year. The Human Rights Commission argued last year that these restrictions should apply for no more than 3 months prior to the election, yet Parliament ignored the Commission and imposed restrictions for the full year. We can’t undo the censorship we have had to put up with since 1 January 2008, but it is not too late to repeal the law and for the parties to fight this election under the old electoral law.”

John Boscawen also said “Both the Human Rights Commission and the Electoral Commission said last year that third parties who wanted to influence the election result by placing election advertisements should be allowed to spend up to $300,000. Parliament ignored them on this issue also, and if the Act is not to be repealed in its entirety before the election, it is not too late for Parliament to amend it and to allow third parties to spend up to $300,000 as recommended by both these bodies.”

The parties supporting the Electoral Finance Act had argued last year that it was required to increase transparency of donations to political parties. We have seen in recent weeks how easy it is to get around these restrictions. We are now told that the Vela family and their companies reputedly gave New Zealand First $150,000 over 5 years. Winston Peters says neither he nor New Zealand First did anything illegal in this regard and he could be absolutely correct. More importantly, exactly the same thing could happen in 2008 despite the Electoral Finance Act. If the Velas had 10 New Zealand-owned companies, each could give up to $10,000 of their own money to New Zealand First (or any other political party) this year. Nothing in the Electoral Finance Act would require this $100,000 to be disclosed (the New Zealand Companies Office records show that there could be at least 8 separate Vela family branded companies and a further 5 associated with New Zealand Bloodstock Limited business).

John Boscawen also said: “The uncertainty and the complexity of the law has been highlighted by the fact that Labour, New Zealand First, The Greens and the Progressives have all fallen foul of it, with the Progressives recently having had an advertisement published early this year referred to the police by the Electoral Commission.”

ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>

 
 

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election