Tuesday, 1 October 2002, 2:58 pm Press Release: Green Party
ERMA decision raises serious questions of law
interpretation
Green Party Co-leader Jeanette Fitzsimons
said today ERMA's decision to approve engineering of cows
with a wide range of genes raised serious questions about
ERMA's interpretation of the law, and its dismissal of
public opinion.
"If they approve this, what won't they
approve?" she said. "Surveys show an overwhelming number of
New Zealanders are opposed to genetically engineering cows
in order to produce pharmaceuticals, especially if they're
using human genes."
Ms Fitzsimons said ERMA's decision to
allow AgResearch to genetically engineer cows containing
genes from humans, sheep, deer, other cattle, mice or goats,
set a dangerous precedent by approving GE applications where
the full risks were unknown.
"It opens the floodgates for
approval of large groups of experiments using unknown
genetic material with unknown effects."
She said it was
not possible to know the full risks, as full information on
the types of genes to be used in the experiment, and the
proteins they would make was not known.
"ERMA's conditions
for containment miss the point. Building fences might keep
cows in, but cannot contain genetic material which will be
released into soil and groundwater, and be carried by
insects.
"The only benefit identified by ERMA was new
skills for scientists and scientific information for
researchers. If expanding your knowledge and increasing your
skills are enough to outweigh unknown risks, you can justify
germ warfare."
If you're using Scoop for work, your organisation needs to pay a small license fee with Scoop Pro. We think that's fair, because your organisation is benefiting from using our news resources. In return, we'll also give your team access to pro news tools and keep Scoop free for personal use, because public access to news is important!
Winston Peters is routinely described as the kingmaker who decides whether the centre right or the centre-left has a turn at running this country. He also plays a less heralded, but equally important role as the scapegoat who can be blamed for killing taxes that his senior partners never much wanted in the first place. Neither Ardern nor Robertson for example, really wanted a capital gains tax, for fear of Labour copping the “tax and spend“ label they ended up being saddled with anyway. Usefully though, they could tell the party faithful it was wicked old Winston who killed the CGT... More
The National Party claims the new coalition government will be stable, effective, and will deliver for all Kiwis. "Despite the challenging economic environment, New Zealanders can look forward to a better future because of the changes the new Government will make ... We know that, with the right leadership, the right policies, and the right direction, together New Zealanders can make this an even better country," says Christopher Luxon... More
“The new Government’s plan to expand oil and gas exploration is as dangerous as it is unscientific. Whatever you think about the new government, there is simply no mandate to trash the climate. We need to come together to stop them,” says James Shaw... More
MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru... More