Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
License needed for work use Register
Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Taxpayers lose when public assets sold offshore

Taxpayers lose when public assets sold offshore

28 January 2011

Labour leader Phil Goff today released figures which show how National's sale of Contact Energy in 1999 was a bad deal for taxpayers but a great deal for foreign companies.

"Foreign-owned Edison made a lot of money out of the sale of Contact,” Phil Goff said. “It sold its 51 per cent stake in Contact for nearly $1.7 billion in 2004 when the whole company was sold for $2.3 billion in 1999.

"That's windfall money New Zealanders missed out on and foreign companies walked away with. There's only one winner out of privatisation and it's not the taxpayer," Phil Goff said.

"For John Key to claim selling our prized assets to foreigners will be good for the economy is nonsense and these figures prove that.

"Since it was sold offshore, Contact has paid out dividends of $1.5 billion to its private shareholders - that's more money that has gone offshore and hasn't been delivered back to the country,” Phil Goff said.

"Also, National made a big deal of selling Contact to ‘mum and dad’ investors in 1999 --- just as John Key claimed this week that these same mysterious investors would buy our power companies and Air New Zealand.

"But the figures I am releasing today show that was fallacy then and will be again if John Key gets his way.”

Phil Goff said the figures show:
o The number of shareholders fell 34,845 in just six months after the sale in 1999.
o The number of shareholders has fallen from 225,000 at sale to just 80,911 last year.
o The majority shareholder is Australian-owned Origin Energy with 51 per cent
o Just under 75 percent of shares are held by 20 companies

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

"These figures show that once a state asset is sold, foreign-owned companies quickly swoop in and take control, leaving New Zealanders out in the cold and out of pocket,” Phil Goff said.

"Other figures released today also show what a bad deal the sale of Contact was for New Zealand.

"Contact also charges amongst the highest prices in the country while directors' fees rose from $270,000 in 2003 to $993,000 in 2010.

"Contact is just one example of the failure of privatisation --- think Air New Zealand, TranzRail and Telecom. None worked for New Zealanders and left us in a worse position.

"Labour will stop National's privatisation agenda. Labour is committed to keeping Kiwi assets in Kiwi hands," Phil Goff said.

ENDS


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On How Climate Change Threatens Cricket‘s Future

Well that didn’t last long, did it? Mere days after taking on what he called the “awesome responsibility” of being Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon has started blaming everyone else and complaining that he's inherited “economic vandalism on an unprecedented scale” - which is how most of us would describe his own coalition agreements, 100-Day Plan, and backdated $3 billion handout to landlords... More


 
 
Public Housing Futures: Christmas Comes Early For Landlords

New CTU analysis of the National & ACT coalition agreement has shown the cost of returning interest deductibility to landlords is an extra $900M on top of National’s original proposal. This is because it is going to be implemented earlier and faster, including retrospective rebates from April 2023. More


Green Party: Petition To Save Oil & Gas Ban

“The new Government’s plan to expand oil and gas exploration is as dangerous as it is unscientific. Whatever you think about the new government, there is simply no mandate to trash the climate. We need to come together to stop them,” says James Shaw. More

PSA: MFAT Must Reverse Decision To Remove Te Reo

MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru. More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.