Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

The Nation: Lisa Owen interviews Philip Klein

On The Nation: Lisa Owen interviews Philip Klein
Youtube clips from the show are available here.
Donald Trump is President Elect, but many in his own party distanced themselves from him during the campaign. So what happens within the GOP now? Lisa Owen talks to Washington Examiner managing editor and Never Trump Republican Philip Klein.
Lisa Owen: We’ve seen these images of President Obama and the President-Elect Trump side by side in the White House. Extraordinary. What did you make of those images?
Philip Klein: I think it’s going to take a while to get used to for a lot of people after the long campaign and a lot of the things that Donald Trump has said and his reputation. Sort of, it’s due to being on reality TV and so forth. Now there’s no choice but to take him seriously, and there he is sitting in the very historic room of the White House where you’re typically used to seeing the president there welcoming foreign leaders and talking about what they discussed in their summit. And so it is startling to see Donald Trump there, and it’s going to take some adjustment, I think, for everyone.
Given the polling and the much, I suppose, division within the Republican movement, were you surprised that he managed to pull this off?
I think it was, I mean, a surprise to a lot of people, including myself. The polling seemed to indicate that Hillary Clinton had a comfortable enough lead in a critical number of states to win, and he pulled it off.
What do you think got him over the line? Who delivered this to him?
I think it was a combination of two things. Trump did better than Mitt Romney among whites without a college degree, many of whom voted for Obama in 2012. And also Clinton didn’t do as well as Obama in turning out and getting the support of young people and minority groups.
You said at one stage that you wouldn’t vote for him. Did you vote for him?
I did not.
Can you tell us who you did vote for?
I ended up writing in ‘none of the above’.
Did you throw your vote away?
I don’t think I did. I, in the end, voted my conscience, and I decided not to vote for either of them.
Did you ever imagine that that would happen in your lifetime — where you go to cast your vote and there is no choice that you want?
I mean, it’s sort of if you follow… I don’t believe in putting too much faith in politicians, so I guess it’s not startling that it would ever be that situation.
Now, you’ve called Trump in the past a megalomaniac who doesn’t understand constitutional limits on executive power. So how worried are you about what happens from this point onwards?
As I’ve written a number of times, I have a number of concerns about how he’s going to perform once in the White House. I stand by everything I wrote. I had, sort of, written after his election a post about a lot of the fears I still have about what he could be about—
So what are they? What are you most worried about with him?
Well, basically, throughout the campaign, he’s demonstrated a lack of, sort of, interest or understanding of issues as well as the proper limits on presidential power, and he’s been very thin-skinned, and so I’m kind of worried about what having that concentrated power in the presidency is going to do. And so that’s why I think it’s up to Congress to reassert its constitutional authority.
When you say he’s thin-skinned, are you worried that he’s going to have a tantrum over something that someone says and do something that has serious implications?
I mean, it could be. We saw that a lot during the campaign, so the question is — was that a role that he was playing during the campaign, and is he going to put it in check during the presidency? I’m sceptical, but we’re kind of in uncharted territory.
What do you think? Do you think he was playing a role during the campaign?
I mean, I think that he was probably playing a lot of different roles but that as president we’re probably going to get a lot of different Trumps. During the campaign he went through different phases. There were phases where he tried to appear more presidential and be more sober-minded and show more compassion and humility. There were other stages where he was very nasty and brash or unserious, and there were some times when he seemed very hawkish on foreign policy and talking about bombing ISIS and so forth. There were other times where he talked about how America shouldn’t be as involved in foreign wars and in military interventions. He spoke about opposing the Iraq War and the intervention in Libya. So he said, sort of, a lot of different things that aren’t actually coherent; they contradict one another. And I imagine that as president, we’re probably going to get a bit of that too — that there’s going to be a wide range of how he’s going to perform.
How much do you think he’s actually going to follow through on, because he’s talking about, you know, banning Muslims, building a wall. Already, we’ve noticed that some of those key policy planks or ideas, if you like, have come down from his website. He seems to be dialling it back. People are now even talking about a metaphorical wall. So how much do you think he will follow through on those things that potentially delivered the presidency to him?
I think that banning Muslims is unlikely to happen, I mean, for no other reason that it’s completely impractical to implement. Anyone could say, ‘Well, I’m not—’ I mean, how are you going to have a test, really? If somebody says, ‘I’m not a Muslim,’ how are you going to test whether or not they’re Muslim? So in terms of practicality, it’s impossible to implement. I can’t really see him doing that. I think that he’ll have a harder time not following it through on the promise to build a wall, because it was such an integral part of his candidacy that he said at almost every stop.
And to you that’s a real wall, not a metaphorical wall that people are now discussing?
I think that if he doesn’t build a physical wall… And now if you look at the border of the United States, there are parts of it that are separated by waters where you’re not actually— There would only be a certain portion of the border where you could actually be able to build a physical wall. I think it’s going to be hard for him if he doesn’t— if he doesn’t build some sort of wall somewhere, even if it might not be—
So in your mind it will happen?
I mean, I don’t know. I’ve kind of… I’ve sort of refrained from making any more predictions about Trump and what’s going to happen after the result that we saw on Tuesday.
I can understand why. You mentioned the Republicans have Congress. Many of them denounced Trump during the campaign. Will they temper him, do you think? Rein him in?
I don’t have faith that Republicans will try to temper him or rein him in. Generally speaking, most politicians tend to go along with whoever is in power in their party. So during the Bush administration, for instance, Democrats were very big on arguing that… against executive power, and they said the Bush exerted too much executive power and needed to be reined in. When Obama came into office, Democrats defended his use of executive power, and Republicans were the ones talking about the abuse of executive power. And so when Trump comes back in, I assume it’s just going to reverse again. And so I think people are more outcome based. If Trump is doing things that they like, then they don’t care about the means at which he goes about it.
People observing this might find that really strange, because you had the likes of Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan just backing away big time during the campaign. Do you think they’re all just going to fall into line?
I think probably they’ll fall into line, yeah. I mean, it would have to take something rather dramatic for them to start opposing. I mean, a lot of it too depends on how Trump’s approval rating is and how he’s perceived among Republican constituencies. If he’s seen as completely betraying Republicans and going in a completely different direction and there’s wide opposition, you might see Republicans start to back away from him, because they’re going to be facing re-election and worried about 2018 when all of Congress and a third of the Senate is up for re-election again. And so I think that if you followed during the campaign, what you saw was there was a pretty clear line that if Trump was up in the polls, Republicans were saying things that were more complimentary towards him. When he started falling in the polls and got into trouble, like with the tape that came out on Access Hollywood talking about groping women—
So they were saving themselves?
Yeah. So I think that in the beginning, there’s a bit of a honeymoon period. People are going to give him a chance and be fairly deferential to Trump. If he ends up tanking in the polls and losing the faith and disillusioning a lot of his supporters, like, let’s say, for instance, he doesn’t build a wall and a lot of people come to see him as a fraud, then you might see Republicans want to resist him a bit more. During the Bush administration, you didn’t really see Republicans start to push back until the second half of the second term.
We’re running out of time, but I do quickly want to touch on the polls, because they were so wrong. Many of them in the days before were saying 70% chance or more of Hillary Clinton being president. I’m wondering what happened there. Did people say one thing and then do another?
There might’ve been some of that. I think it was a combination of a number of factors. Basically what polls try to do is they try to say… There’s two aspects of it. One is they ask who you’re going to vote for, and another aspect is they have to choose how likely somebody is to vote. You don’t know who’s going to show up on Election Day. You have to basically, as a pollster, guess, and they guessed wrong. There were a lot of people that showed up that weren’t expected to show up, and a lot of people that were expected to show up did not show up. And Hillary Clinton particularly, because of the decrease in her ability to win over minority voters and losing a number of white areas that went for Obama, that was a difference, and the polls did not detect it.
Thank you so much for joining us this morning. Much appreciated.
Thank you.

Transcript provided by Able. www.able.co.nz

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On What Lessons The Greens Should Take From The Demise Of Winston Peters

Wondering about “if only" is one of those political games we all indulge in from time to time. For example: episode one of the latest season of The Good Fight TV series dropped us into a world where Hillary Clinton is the US President and Elizabeth Warren and Merrick Garland are Supreme Court justices, where rain forests are being saved and polar bears are coming back from extinction. Yet alarmingly, people keep on having these bad dreams about Donald Trump being the President... More>>

 


Referendum Preliminary Results: 'Yes' On End-Of-Life, 'No' On Recreational Cannabis

End of Life Choice Referendum The referendum asked the question: 'Do you support the End of Life Choice Act 2019 coming into force?' 65.2% Yes 33.8% No 1.0% Informal VOTES NUMBER OF VOTES RECEIVED PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL VOTES Yes 1,574,645 65.2% ... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On National Being Shafted By Its Own Creation

As it licks its wounds, let’s hope the National Party can still find time to look back with some pride at what it has achieved in Epsom. The Act Party’s nationwide success on Saturday night has been a tribute to National’s foresight, and to its ... More>>

ALSO:

Green Party: 'Fruitful Discussions ... Further Discussions To Have'

The Green Party says there is a negotiation going on with the Labour Party, but there are more discussions to be had. More>>

ALSO:


Border: No Changes To Border Exemptions After Fishing Crew Test Covid-19 Positive

The cases were detected after routine day three testing but the immigration minister and air commodore agree there's no need to change border exemptions. More>>

Election: ParityBOT_NZ Processed Nearly 200,000 Tweets To Find And Fight Online Abuse Over The NZ Election

Auckland, New Zealand: Of the almost 200,000 tweets directed at women candidates that Areto Labs’ proprietary election Twitter bot, ParityBOT_NZ, processed over the New Zealand election period, nearly 4,000 were classified as toxic and triggered ... More>>

Stats NZ: New Report Shows Significant Changes To New Zealand’s Climate

Climate change is already happening in New Zealand and could have a profound impact on future generations of New Zealanders, a new report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ says. Our atmosphere and climate 2020 , released today, includes analysis ... More>>

ALSO:

Judith Collins: Obese People Must Take Responsibility For 'personal Choices'

National Party leader Judith Collins has described obesity as a weakness and says people should not 'blame systems for personal choices'. More>>

Māori Party: Poll Reveals Tamihere On Cusp Of Historic Māori Movement Election Victory

John Tamihere’s election campaign is on the rise and on track to return the Māori Party to parliament, a new Māori TV poll has revealed. The poll released on 11 October during the seventh and final Māori TV Maori Electoral campaign coverage has Tamihere ... More>>


 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels