Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Unjustified Use Of Force In Christchurch


The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that a Police officer’s use of his dog was excessive, when arresting a woman in Christchurch on 13 February 2021.

The woman and a man were wanted for a series of burglaries across the South Island, targeting cigarettes. Police believed the couple may be carrying firearms.

On the evening of 13 February, the dog handler located the couple in a stolen Mazda, driven by the man. A pursuit was initiated and abandoned less than two minutes later. Police then used road spikes to try to stop the Mazda.

The Mazda drove into a cul-de-sac. The dog handler followed in his Police car, and a short time later reported the man had rammed him. The Mazda then drove into a side street and the couple fled on foot.

The Police dog led the dog handler and another officer to a hedge, indicating one of the Mazda occupants was behind it. The dog handler says he did not see who was behind the hedge before he sent the dog in to apprehend the person. The hiding woman received a serious dog bite injury to her leg.

The Authority found the pursuit was an inappropriate tactic in the circumstances and the Southern Emergency Communications Centre correctly applied policy when instructing for it be abandoned. It was reasonable for Police to use road spikes.

Police initially charged the man for driving into the officer’s Police car. However, they later realised the damage to the cars was not consistent with the collision as described by the dog handler, so the charges were withdrawn. We believe the dog handler deliberately drove into Mr Y’s car, in breach of policy, and his subsequent statements were false.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

There were conflicting accounts of what occurred at the time the woman was bitten by the dog. However, the Authority found she had no real means of escape.

Authority Chair, Judge Colin Doherty, says: “It is unreasonable to set a dog on an unknown person, who is neither escaping nor using force to resist arrest, for no other reason than that they may have a firearm, when there is no good cause to suspect that they actually do.” Therefore, the use of the dog was unjustified and excessive.

Police acted reasonably in taking the woman immediately to a doctor rather than providing first aid at the scene.

The Authority found the investigating officer failed to adequately investigate the collision between the Police car and fleeing car. He also submitted a Traffic Crash Report which was factually incorrect and supported charging the man with offences he did not commit.

A copy of the report is attached.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines




InfoPages News Channels


Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.