Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Costs, benefits, rugby and refugees

Costs, benefits, rugby and refugees


Murdoch Stephens – Doing Our Bit (www.doingourbit.co.nz)

Amongst all of the last day’s reports – ChangeMakers releasing their criticism of the lack of support for asylum seekers[1]; Peter Dunne suggesting an increase in the quota to 1000 places[2]; my analysis of New Zealand and asylum seekers for Glasgow’s GRAMnet[3] – some numbers on the costs of refugees have been haphazardly flying around in the mainstream media.

How do we measure the cost or benefit of something?

Today the Manawatu Standard, part of Fairfax’s network, reported that refugees cost New Zealand $50m per year[4]. It is a curious number, likely plucked from an analysis of the costs of refugees over a three-year period. However, it ignores one basic element of an economic cost-benefit analysis: the benefit.

The figure can be sub-divided into five departments: $5.7 m on Immigration, $5.3m on Social Development, $8.2m on Health, $18.5m on Education, $12m on Housing[5].

So the cost is $50m over three years.

Lets compare that to the cost of hosting the Rugby World Cup. Fairfax reports a cost of $66m for the event.[6] But the idea that we spend money on sport is not the point. The point is what comes next.

Murray McCully, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade, states that the tournament was “absolutely” worth it financially, with a kickback for the economy that would be felt for years to come.

He reaches this conclusion by referencing a study by Coventry University's centre for the international business of sport, commissioned by MasterCard, to show a long-term net benefit to the country of $1.44b.

This is the crux of the matter. Costs or benefits are determined by comparing long term costs and long term benefits.

Consider a 2009 Department of Labour analysis of the cost of immigration to New Zealand[7]. There they show that 18% of our GDP is spent on immigrants to New Zealand. They go on to show that 24.7% of our GDP is accrued from immigrants. In short, immigrants add more to the economy than they cost.

Refugees have greater needs than immigrants and overall they are likely to be a short-term cost. But the problem with the government’s analysis is that they refuse to calculate the monetary benefits of refugees. Refugee’s tax payments (income tax, GST, and the rest) are unlikely to be more than $50 over three years, but the tax intake will be in the tens of millions.

If Murray McCully displayed the same loyalty to refugees as he did to rugby, he might come up with some similar sentiments.

For example, do we usually consider education to be such a dead cost? Roughly forty percent of refugees coming into New Zealand on our quota are under 18. These are the people costing the taxpayer $18.5m over three years in education.
And what does the taxpayer get back? They get the one thing they need to survive: more taxpayers, more skilled workers, more New Zealanders.

The government does not begrudge young New Zealanders their education and they don’t harangue the NZRU about the World Cup. Instead they take a long term look at education and indulge in the most highly inflated statistics about flow on effects for a sports tournament.

There is no reason that New Zealand’s young refugees should not be accorded the same dignity as our young people. There is no reason why New Zealand’s refugees should not be accorded the same optimism to their economic benefits as our elite sportsmen.

This is, of course, only the economic argument. There are other hard to quantify benefits, such as an increase in our international standing, that will come to mean a lot when the Universal Periodic Review is undertaken in February and New Zealand is assessed for our readiness for a place on the UN Security Council.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On Drone Strikes And Judith Collins‘ Last Stand

The news that a New Zealand citizen was killed last November in a US drone attack in Yemen brings the drones controversy closer to home.

To the US, drones are a legitimate response to the threat posed by the al Qaeda organisation and its franchisees... To the US, the drones carry the added advantage of not putting US troops at risk on the ground, and minimises the need for putting them in large numbers in bases in the countries concerned, always a politically sensitive point.

The counter-argument, well articulated by security analyst Paul Buchanan on RNZ this morning, is that this particular drone attack can be said to amount to an extra-judicial execution of a New Zealand citizen by one of our military allies, in circumstances where the person concerned posed no threat to New Zealand’s domestic security. More>>

 

Parliament Today:

Policies: Labour’s Economic Upgrade For Manufacturing

Labour Leader David Cunliffe has today announced his Economic Upgrade for the manufacturing sector – a plan that will create better jobs and higher wages. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And ACC Work Of Sir Owen Woodhouse

With the death of Sir Owen Woodhouse, the founding father of the Accident Compensation Scheme, New Zealand has lost one of the titans of its post-war social policy. More>>

ALSO:

Bad Transnationals: Rio Tinto Wins 2013 Roger Award

It won the 2011 Roger Award and was runner up in 2012, 2009 and 08. One 2013 nomination said simply and in its entirety: “Blackmailing country”... More>>

ALSO:

Select Committees: Tobacco Plain Packaging Hearings

The Stroke Foundation is today backing the Cancer Society and Smokefree Coalition who are making oral submissions to the Health Select Committee in support of proposed legislation to remove of all branding from tobacco products. More>>

ALSO:

Milk: Oravida Asked For Cabinet Help

New evidence released by New Zealand First today reveals Justice Minister Judith Collins used her position to manipulate the Government to help her husband’s company, Oravida, after the Fonterra botulism scare, says New Zealand First Leader Rt Hon Winston Peters. More>>

ALSO:

With Conditions: Ruataniwha Consents Approved In Draft Decision

The Tukituki Catchment Proposal Board of Inquiry has granted 17 resource consents relating to the $265 million Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme in a draft decision that would open more of the Hawke’s Bay to irrigation. More>>

ALSO:

Fast Lanes, Campervans: Labour 'Making The Holidays Easier For Kiwi Drivers'

The next Labour Government will make the holidays easier and journeys quicker for Kiwi families driving on the roads, says Labour Leader David Cunliffe. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Royalty And Its Tourism Spin-Offs

Ultimately the Queen’s longevity has been one of her most significant accomplishments. A transition to Prince Charles while the monarchy was in the pits of public esteem in the mid to late 1990s would have been disastrous for the Royal Firm. Far more congenial representatives have now emerged... More>>

ALSO:

Privacy (Again): ACC Demands Excessive Privacy Waivers

Labour: “This is just another example of ACC under National deliberately acting to deny treatment and compensation... Those who did fill in the form have effectively been victims of yet another ACC privacy breach. This time Judith Collins knew it was happening..." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news