Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
License needed for work use Register
Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Broadcasting Member's Bill

Broadcasting (2005 Election Broadcasting Reimbursement) Amendment Bill

Member’s Bill

Explanatory note

This bill requires the reimbursement of broadcasting spending by the Electoral Commission in relation to the New Zealand National Party prior to the general election on 17 September 2005, but currently unable to be paid under the Broadcasting Act 1989.

Clause 5 inserts a new section 70E that requires the Electoral Commission to pay the outstanding amounts to the broadcasters involved, and for the New Zealand National Party to reimburse the Electoral Commission for that cost.


Dr Don Brash MP

Broadcasting (2005 Election Broadcasting Reimbursement) Amendment Bill

Member’s Bill

Contents


1. Title
2. Commencement
3. Principal Act mended
4. Purpose
5. New Section 70E inserted


1 Title
This Act is the Broadcasting (2005 Election Broadcasting Reimbursement) Amendment Act 2006.

2 Commencement
This Act comes into force on the day after the date on which it receives the Royal assent.

3 Principal Act amended
This Act amends the Broadcasting Act 1989.

4 Purpose
The purpose of this Act is to amend the principal Act to require the Electoral Commission to reimburse broadcasters from moneys made available by the New Zealand National Party for certain costs incurred in broadcasting election programmes in respect of that party during the election period prior to the general election held on 17 September 2005 but currently unable to be paid under the principal Act.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

5 New section 70E inserted
The principal Act is amended by inserting, before section 71, the section:
“70E Reimbursements related to the 2005 general election
“(1) The Electoral Commission must make the following payments to broadcasters for material mistakenly ordered by the New Zealand National Party during the election period before the general election held on 17 September 2005:
“(a) $57,369.00 to Television New Zealand Ltd; and
“(b) $20,013.62 to TV3 Ltd; and
“(c) $3,327.49 to Prime Television Ltd; and
“(d) $6,887.75 to Sky Network Television Ltd; and
“(e) $24,895.62 to The Radio Bureau Ltd.
“(2) The Electoral Commission must make the payments specified in subsection (1) out of a payment of $112,493.48 received from the New Zealand National Party the day after the commencement of the Broadcasting (2005 Election Broadcasting Reimbursement) Amendment Act 2006.
“(3) The payments specified in subsection (1) must be made within 1 month of the receipt of the payment specified in subsection (2).
“(4) To avoid doubt, nothing in this Act limits or affects this section.”

Ends

______________________


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The Government's Assault On Maori

This isn’t news, but the National-led coalition is mounting a sustained assault on Treaty rights and obligations. Even so, Christopher Luxon has described yesterday’s nationwide protests by Maori as “pretty unfair.” Poor thing. In the NZ Herald, Audrey Young has compiled a useful list of the many, many ways that Luxon plans to roll back the progress made here over the past 40 years in race relations... More


 
 
Public Housing Futures: Christmas Comes Early For Landlords

New CTU analysis of the National & ACT coalition agreement has shown the cost of returning interest deductibility to landlords is an extra $900M on top of National’s original proposal. This is because it is going to be implemented earlier and faster, including retrospective rebates from April 2023. More


Green Party: Petition To Save Oil & Gas Ban

“The new Government’s plan to expand oil and gas exploration is as dangerous as it is unscientific. Whatever you think about the new government, there is simply no mandate to trash the climate. We need to come together to stop them,” says James Shaw. More

PSA: MFAT Must Reverse Decision To Remove Te Reo

MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru. More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.