Celebrating 25 Years of Scoop
Special: Up To 25% Off Scoop Pro Learn More

Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search


Testing Of Smell And Noise Too ‘subjective’ Claims Councillor

Smell and noise tests have been criticised by a West Coast Regional Councillor who says a lack of technology isn't good enough.

31 environmental complaints and incidents for the region were logged by council during the January-March quarter.

During the period council received four specific complaints about a Coal Creek private site -- all related to "a strong odour coming from a landfill".

In the first, an after hours on call council officer identified "a very subtle" odour.

In the second incident council received two calls about strong odour from the site but council staff visiting could not detect any odour.

A third incident saw council compliance staff on the roadside below the site identifying the smell coming from above which disappeared shortly afterwards.

The fourth call out saw after hours council staff detect nothing. There was no wind at the time.

In a separate investigation, council also failed to agree on reports of "a strong smell of sewage" emanating around Blaketown for four days.

The Taylorville Resource Park site at Coal Creek near Greymouth has been the source of complaint from nearby residents to the West Coast Regional Council in the past 15 months.

And when locals complained of a strong "odour of tar" from a late night resealing operation in Greymouth, council staff could only detect "a slight odour".

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Cr Peter Ewen questioned the methodology where council officers "sniffed the air" to investigate complaints as it seemed subjective.

"Whilst it might be 'slight', slight doesn't come into it," he said.

He asked if the consent condition for the Coal Creek site was "no odour outside the boundary".

Compliance manager Chris Barnes said it referred to no 'objectionable odour' outside the boundary.

Cr Ewen said that too sounded subjective.

Mr Barnes said smell detection was based on wind conditions.

"Often the notifications come in when it's been still, then a wind comes up. By the time we get out there, unfortunately for the people notifying us, it's gone."

Cr Ewen also noted a complaint in the report of a mine "exceeding noise requirements", near Hokitika.

But the site was not "emitting excessive noise" when both the regional and district councils followed up.

Mr Barnes said it relied on an officer "checking if the noise is excessive".

Cr Ewen said that seemed problematic given the technology available now.

"If we've got council officers going out without instrumentation, and relying on their view, we're going to run into problems," he said.

Mr Barnes said there was no agreement to use noise detection equipment from the Westland District Council, as the noise control authority.

Cr Ewen: "that's not good enough".

Cr Peter Haddock, a miner and contractor, said he believed noise testing was not as simple as holding up a decibel reader.

Mr Barnes said there were at least two methods council could use.

But an initial assessment was required first before council commissioned technical noise testing.

"We have to make the right call at the right time, as 90% of the cost comes back to council," he said.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines




InfoPages News Channels


Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.